So the supreme court start hearing arguments on this tomorrow. Here is summary of current case thus far
Anyways, listening to a podcast and they bring up a good point, that stuff like Ultrasound and other tests were not wide spread back then and it may have changed people's perceptions at the time. But then given the social connotation, feminism, etc that attached itself to the case at the time and after, have polarized people in favor of abortion.
So this brings up the Texas heart beat bill as well, in terms of ultrasounds and testing. But I have seen some people on here in other threads even mention they support abortion to an extent, maybe after 20 weeks, other circumstances, etc. However, this does highlight the Texas law and the 20 weeks, vs what makes 6 weeks any different?
At 20 weeks, people cite the nervous system, etc... but you need a nervous system for a heart beat. So the 6 weeks signifies a nervous system, a heart beat, etc. So I can follow that line of logic about the 20 weeks, but that would make them have to bring it back to about 6 weeks, with heart beat, etc. Just as a father, I know I could see a heart beat even at 5 weeks, and you could see the baby moving that the doctor could even jokingly call dancing at 16 weeks, which already is giving personality to the baby.
Anyways, you now have a NH senator arguing that if Roe v Wade is overturned, they are inciting INSURRECTION and REVOLUTION.
https://news.yahoo.com/dem-senator-warns-supreme-court-150420561.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...evolution-if-roe-v-wade-overturned/ar-AARjgjO
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-senator-revolution-roe-wade-overturned
This is an obvious insurrection of not only the republic system (Mississippi and other states fighting for state rights), but also the judicial system (supreme court). She should be removed from office at the very least. Calling for a legit revolution/color war? Disgusting.