G
Guestx
Guest
It's more us thinking TS is an idiot for double posting it like anyone gave a fuck the first time it was posted.
60 posts and counting, brah. Thanks partially to you.
It's more us thinking TS is an idiot for double posting it like anyone gave a fuck the first time it was posted.
That and Tom Green getting his desk chainsawed in half by some redneck metalhead are my favorite moments in late night television.
I think there's that little bit about getting it on store shelves.
60 posts and counting, brah. Thanks partially to you.
Milo is certainly well-known in certain circles, but he's not well-known like Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly, etc are. So it doesn't surprise me that the publishers weren't ready to hand over a cool mil.
There isn't actually 60 posts, the mods combined this with the other thread because you can't actually look at the first page before you shitpost.
I guess I misunderstood Fawlty. But I think what drives Milo's point home is that if a leftist gay guy used that word it would get published but he has to self censure. I've seen books that used other slurs in the title on feminist and black studies sections.Obviously. @Fawlty is just talking shit.
Splashing "Dangerous " on the cover is a terrible business move, both because some stores will refuse to carry it and because a lot of people would be a bit too bashful to take it to the counter.
Why don't you cry some more?
Thanks for bumping the thread though.
I've seen books that used other slurs in the title on feminist and black studies sections.
^^
Imagine if a country singer put this out, instead of John Lennon
In fairness, even John Lennon would get shit for this today
(I mean, if he hadn't dieded)
He only got 250 after all the exposure over the last couple years? He needs to fire his agent.
It's also funny that the title is actually "Dangerous " but he's too PC to stick up for it, so he went with "Dangerous" because he's a frightened little sellout.
I'll protest by not buying it and not giving a shit. Hopefully others follow suit.
Well, when you're caught on tape clearly practicing Nazism, you are a White Supremacist group.
The only fact is that the Alt-right term is simply the political correct term for White Supremacist.
How does it make you feel that he was too scared to give his book its real title? That his sellout price was only 250k.
You guys realize that if alt-right was really synonymous with national socialist, they wouldn't be supporting a flamboyant homosexual, right? I don't think many white supremacists are ok with homosexuality.
They have obviously grown into a much broader group than that.
tbh, I don't see anyone here actually giving a fuck about this article.
It's more us thinking TS is an idiot for double posting it like anyone gave a fuck the first time it was posted.