- Joined
- Jul 8, 2007
- Messages
- 12,101
- Reaction score
- 5,015
And yet he was only 188 lbs for his Welterweight fight at UFC 232.
And people cry about Conor at 145 and Khabib... Shoot, that is bigger then some MW by fight night.
Came here to post this, BS when guys sort of brag about their weight cuts / walkaround weight.And yet he was only 188 lbs for his Welterweight fight at UFC 232.
I think he meant between the fights, as i don't think it's possible to cut 45lbs of water (at least not at 200 pounds of bodyweight).And yet he was only 188 lbs for his Welterweight fight at UFC 232.
And yet he was only 188 lbs for his Welterweight fight at UFC 232.
And people cry about Conor at 145 and Khabib... Shoot, that is bigger then some MW by fight night.
Highest weight cut I have on record is Holloway, pre-slurring incident; he cut from 178 lbs.I think he meant between the fights, as i don't think it's possible to cut 45lbs of water (at least not at 200 pounds of bodyweight).
Nice to have someone with all this data! 33lbs is nuts; i don't understand it in Holloway's case, with that frame he could easily walk around at 165 pounds...Highest weight cut I have on record is Holloway, pre-slurring incident; he cut from 178 lbs.
I'm as confused by it as I am by the fact that Joanna used to cut 20 lbs despite having such a lanky frame.Nice to have someone with all this data! 33lbs is nuts; i don't understand it in Holloway's case, with that frame he could easily walk around at 165 pounds...
I'm as confused by it as I am by the fact that Joanna used to cut 20 lbs despite having such a lanky frame.
Very interesting chart, thanks.With Conrat at FW it was visually noticeable making other FW's look like midgets. With Khabib you can't show me a single picture of him making anyone looking smaller than him in the cage, on the flip side Khabib is the one who looked small and malnourished against Abel and Tibau. Khabib is an average sized LW at BEST, his failed unprofessional weight cuts are what haters hang on to, nothing else.
View attachment 715851
View attachment 715853