Media Michael Chandler "wouldn't be surprised" to get a title shot after beating Conor McGregor

Chandler will definitely have to fight one more time if he wins. The UFC wants Conor to win.
 
It's pretty much locked on that the winner of their fight will get a title shot. It's not fair but it's the way the UFC works, it's not a true sport with any semblance of fairness (no prize fighting is really).
 
Chandler-Colby would be the UFC’s dream. They’ve been trying to force-feed both into title shots for obvious reasons.
 
Would arguably the most undeserved titleshot of all time, and there have been many.

His best win was 12 years ago against Eddie. He has wins over Benson and Tony but they were clearly past their primes and that Benson win was almost 7 years ago, well and a rematch against even more washed up Benson like three years ago.

His next best win is Dan Hooker. This guy is 4-4 last four years, best win being Dan Hooker.

This guy literally got destroyed in his absolute prime against Will Brooks twice, fought subpar competition almost for the entirety of his career, got ktfo against a featherweight, gets a couple easy fights, then gets Dan Hooker and proceeds to get the big name after big name and loses to everyone but walking corpse in Tony and Ferg wasn't looking bad either before that kick.

I'm not sure who wins that fight, but if he gets a titleshot, that would be most undeserved titleshot of all time out of many terrible titleshots that came before.
 
Arman said it best lol


That's a bit disingenuous. Particularly for Poirier, who has like 25 UFC fights & fought fucking everyone to get where he is. I'm not even a big fan of DP because for reason he rubs me the wrong way at times, but he's paid all his dues.

Maybe Arman should take note. Stay active, finish fights, & create your legacy instead of relying on the bigger names to throw down the ladder & do it for him.
 
Would arguably the most undeserved titleshot of all time, and there have been many.

His best win was 12 years ago against Eddie. He has wins over Benson and Tony but they were clearly past their primes and that Benson win was almost 7 years ago, well and a rematch against even more washed up Benson like three years ago.

His next best win is Dan Hooker. This guy is 4-4 last four years, best win being Dan Hooker.

This guy literally got destroyed in his absolute prime against Will Brooks twice, fought subpar competition almost for the entirety of his career, got ktfo against a featherweight, gets a couple easy fights, then gets Dan Hooker and proceeds to get the big name after big name and loses to everyone but walking corpse in Tony and Ferg wasn't looking bad either before that kick.

I'm not sure who wins that fight, but if he gets a titleshot, that would be most undeserved titleshot of all time out of many terrible titleshots that came before.
More undeserving then his first shot? That was a gift wrapped shot too
 
I wouldn't mind it AT ALL.

Let's keep Islam ACTIVE not picking and choosing, if that means a few bum fights <Fedor23>

Tell Dana to sign better competition.<CanYouSeeMeNow>
 
It's pretty much locked on that the winner of their fight will get a title shot. It's not fair but it's the way the UFC works, it's not a true sport with any semblance of fairness (no prize fighting is really).

I severely doubt Conor can make 155 but if he wins this yeh I think he’ll get WW title shot
 
Have we found the new Colby ? <CanYouSeeMeNow>

GTFO, beating an over the hill Conor would not even give you the title shot in Bellator. <CanYouSeeMeNow>
 
Back
Top