He got called on his shit in this thread and mods got rid of most of it and he hasn’t returned.It’s got to be. You don’t see that level of TDS outside of the this is it version x threads
He got called on his shit in this thread and mods got rid of most of it and he hasn’t returned.It’s got to be. You don’t see that level of TDS outside of the this is it version x threads
No one cares if a mexican person comes here. We care if they sneak in, leech from us, commit crimes etc etc etc. Why do people have to play dumb, like they don't get this?
Mexico is already brown....
it’s like you didn’t follow the story at all and just spouting some stupid shit because you saw trumps face And it short circuited you
Now say I am a trumpster as it’s all you’ve got or some other ad hominem
Glad you mentioned that, I was about to respond to your other post but this one is easier.Its funny how you keep saying they come to leech and commit crimes when the vast majority are employed, if they go to America is to work and they do so because there are jobs waiting for them.
Are you bipolar? Serious question, btw...Trumps been doing really well on the border issue. He finally got Mexico to do their part. By using the threat of tariffs. God Bless the sanity of such a maneuver.
and bc of this wages have gone up. I’m very pleased. Finish that wall. Send the illegals home.
Do you believe the exploitation of uneducated people with no options is a good or a bad thing? (and we're talking illegals here not "immigrants".)
Sometimes. Depends on geography, compensation etc.Do you believe that getting paid to work is exploitation? didnt realized you were a communist.
Sometimes. Depends on geography, compensation etc.
This is the old "Murkans won't do those jerbs" argument again.
Why is it ok to pay an illegal less than you'd pay a citizen?
cycle of exploiting illegals to keep wages down?
Its weird to act virtuous about exploiting people to screw the people who already live here.
Because a living wage in California is different than in say, Maine or Vermont.How does it depends on geography and compensation? work is work, you do it or you dont. Exploitation by nature requires the use of violence and threats.
Yep. Otherwise there is even less justification.Nope.
With that mentality, minimum wage would still be 4.15 per hour.Why is it ok to pay you more when someone is willing to do it for less? thats the essence of capitalism, you dont like it?
Of course. You're not the one getting fucked by it.You call it keeping wages down, i call it keeping prices low.
But we owe them to thieves who jump our border? When you pay someone who lives here illegally under the radar less that you'd have to pay me, then you are indeed robbing me.You sound like an entitled liberal, nobody owes you a good paying job and someone doing what you do for less isnt "robbing you". Also im pretty sure the employer is also a citizen and he benefits from it.
Are you bipolar? Serious question, btw...
You were pooping all over Trump just last week, now you're praising him. What gives?
Because a living wage in California is different than in say, Maine or Vermont.
Yep. Otherwise there is even less justification.
With that mentality, minimum wage would still be 4.15 per hour.
Of course. You're not the one getting fucked by it.
But we owe them to thieves who jump our border? When you pay someone who lives here illegally under the radar less that you'd have to pay me, then you are indeed robbing me.
Compared to Mexico?If they arent getting paid "living wages" they wouldnt be coming dont you think?
Well guess who I'm going to say is the least entitled to American jobs.Why? where on the Constitution does it says that everyone is entitled to a job? jobs arent finite resources.
I don't care about Europe.Switzerland doesnt has minimum wage yet is the country with the highest wages out there.
Sort of, yes. I believe its time to crack down on people who employ illegal immigrants.And so you want to fuck employers that have to deal with entitled people who think a particular job is beneath them?
Agree, as long as they actually belong in this country or have the proper paperwork to work here.No, the employer should decide who gets hired, jobs arent for the government to dispense "fairly".
Yes, its my fault people sneak into the country and take jobs, driving wages down and absorbing my tax dollars.And if they are being hired under the radar is because you are using government to make it difficult for the employer to hire legally.
Compared to Mexico?
Nice idea in theory but what about cost of living and how it varies from state to state, dramatically in many cases?This is a pro union argument and one I can get behind. There should be a minimum standard of pay and one that increases with inflation, not according to profit motives, or an attempt to take advantage of desperation.
That's kind of irrelevant to my point.Nice idea in theory but what about cost of living and how it varies from state to state, dramatically in many cases?
Compared to Mexico?
Well guess who I'm going to say is the least entitled to American jobs.
I don't care about Europe.
Sort of, yes. I believe its time to crack down on people who employ illegal immigrants.
Agree, as long as they actually belong in this country or have the proper paperwork to work here.
Yes, its my fault people sneak into the country and take jobs, driving wages down and absorbing my tax dollars.
I don't blame them for trying to improve their lives, but do for being cut throat competition due to having lower overhead and not being invested in the system. Same goes for businesses willing to employ them. I used to manage a local shop where the owner employed people on work visas because he could pay them 65% of what I made while charging them out at standard rates. Dirty pool if you ask me.
That depends on which rung of the ladder you're standing on that could be reversed.Everyone is a socialist when it comes to earning money but a capitalist when it comes to spending it.
People vote with their wallets in the end.