So Connor lied about 189's million ppv buys in his tweet?
He might not have been lying per se versus being overzealous. That may have been the preliminary data that he took as gospel.
Meltzer said the data was very erratic as it was very area specific. For example, I could see Boston displaying extremely high numbers, while mid west or west coast cities might not have cared at all. That's why it's dangerous to take too much from the preliminary data. For example you typically have 45%-50% carry over from prelims to PPV, but that number can be all over the place.
For example, UFC 184 had a 50% retention rate. Mighty Mouse had an 18% retention rate. The highest numbers are up in the 60's to 70's.
If Rousey cleared 1M buys, she's hitting 65-70% retention rate which would put her among the highest carry overs in recent memory.
Does anyone know why it takes a month to get accurate PPV buy figures? Seems ridiculous to me that it takes that long.
Anyone who believed 189 did a million PPV buys should be bridge shopping. It was corrected down to 800k here and I still, truly do not believe that number.
Conor is a lot of fun, but he's a hardcore fan phenomenon. I have yet to meet another human in the flesh who has any idea who he is. I've not heard one soul talk about him or the event.
You literally cannot escape Rousey. Turn on your TV, radio or open your browser and she's all over everything.
I don't watch (or enjoy) WMMA but the mainstream cross over of RR is unmistakable. She's officially ensconced in pop culture.
Wouldn't UFC and Connor have the exact PPV numbers? I don't think they rely on Meltzer's guesstimation to know how much product they sold.
Wouldn't UFC and Connor have the exact PPV numbers? I don't think they rely on Meltzer's guesstimation to know how much product they sold.
I wouldn't argue that Ronda is, in a broad sense, more popular than anybody else in MMA. The question is how well does that popularity compel people to pay $60 and stay up until midnight to watch a performance that will be all over Facebook the next morning?
Nobody gets them that fast
As I explained in a post after this, even WWE waited over a month for exact numbers
They wouldn't have exact numbers on the night of the event.
You have same time sales and then you have repeat showings. And then you have major operators reporting, then lots of local operators reporting. Then you have things like digital media PPV's like Youtube reporting.
And not all of them tally their numbers immediately after every event. It might be weekly, bi-weekly or monthly. Cable providers aren't operating to the same clocks as the UFC so their internal reporting will be designed around their own accounting needs.
When they report an event on the same night, it's always a rough estimation based upon some general metrics that point to a number with a huge fudge factor. That's why Dana always says it's "trending towards" XXX buys instead of an actual number.
Wouldn't UFC and Connor have the exact PPV numbers? I don't think they rely on Meltzer's guesstimation to know how much product they sold.
Oh okay. Thanks, now I understand.
I think Conor got PPV% for that last fight, so he probably has a good idea....
What's more mind-boggling to me is the Conor card was actually decent, and the Ronda card was pretty stretched out with old guys, cans, and nobodys lol. I guess the PPV buying public is dumber then shit.
I think Conor got PPV% for that last fight, so he probably has a good idea....
What's more mind-boggling to me is the Conor card was actually decent, and the Ronda card was pretty stretched out with old guys, cans, and nobodys lol. I guess the PPV buying public is dumber then shit.
UFC said it did over a 1 million Meltzer only knows the cable buys though , I could easily see another 150k buying it through xbox, fight pass, or just watching it at the movies.
The funny thing is, her quick fights also happen to work in her favor, at times. They end in either violent fashion, or some cool judo move into a slick sub. They also fit into bite-sized chunks, which perfectly suit the attention span of people who are curious about MMA, but couldn't bother to sit through 15-25 minutes worth of a fight.I'm thinking it's a snowball thing. Rousey's fights have combined with her schedule and event releases almost perfectly.
16s Davis win (huge splash)
14s Zingano win in LA, fastest time ever (even bigger splash)
Wrestlemania 31 appearance
Multiple city book and media tour and NYT best seller list
Fast and Furious 7 release (1Bn box office)
Entourage move release (poor box office but lots of media coverage)
In other words, Rousey has managed to get people's attention in the media with her wins, then timed it perfectly with her book tour, WM appearance and movie launches in order to maximize her ability to stay in the public eye.
Now toss in the trash talk leading up to UFC 190 and her appearances on mainstream media outlets to promote the fight and you have the recipe for a juggernaut.
Rousey is basically running a perfect self-promotion campaign combined with attention grabbing fight results.
Rousey and her team at WME could teach a clinic to the rest of the UFC roster on how to self-promote.
Agreed. Considering the relatively new entry of women into MMA, and Conor earning a space for the smaller weight classes, it's good to see success at these levels. Hats off to both of them.Ronda is by far a bigger mainstream personality than Conor.
No knock on Conor, what he has done in the last year to become a star is amazing.
I don't think the UFC cares. Casuals offer time, attention, money, and won't hold any prejudice over who the opponent is. If I were running the UFC, I'd be all over that action.its crazy casuals would rather watch a squash match in a weak division more than anything else the ufc offers.
Well conor has a change of opponent and aldo pulling out killed the fight for me.
That being said how the hell u do 300k buy rate with mcmann,and 1m +with bethe i have no idea .
Guess people just buying into the ronda effect right now