Media McGregor Has 'Bad Grappling: Myth?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Thickfreakness, Jan 17, 2020.

  1. Thickfreakness Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2017
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. I had a discussion on a show I run about Conor McGregor's grappling. In particular, the common assertion that it's bad. I find that most analysts (and fans) go back to this talking-point when assessing his skills. And I think that it's unfounded based on the evidence that we have.

    Here's the short clip.



    In my view, his grappling overall is quite good. The word itself, 'grappling', is used in a very broad sense, because there's a lot to it. And he's better at certain things than others. But I don't see it as being a major hole in his game. And he's proven that over the years.

    He was submitted by Diaz, but, let's be real, he lost that fight on the feet. He resigned himself to his fate because he was about to get smashed by strikes. And even if you disagree with that, I'd argue that getting subbed by Diaz isn't a suitable measuring stick. And the same applies to Khabib. He did OK in some exchanges against him (minus the blatant fouls). But, either way, context is key, and the context is he was fighting Khabib.

    I think he has many problems, perhaps his cardio above all else, but I don't think his grappling is his primary concern.

    What do you think?
     
  2. THE BMF Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2020
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lima
    I believe it’s slightly below average for championship level fighters. It’s not non existent as some say and it’s not secretly amazing as others say.

    People look at these things too black and white imo.
     
  3. Thickfreakness Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2017
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    I said the exact same thing re: your black and white comment. A lot of people think skills are a zero-sum game for some strange reason - either they're great or terrible.
     
  4. SalvadorAllende Yellow Card Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    Messages:
    27,467
    Likes Received:
    4,738
    Location:
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
    He is a good grappler and his TDD is really really good.

    Who does not get grapplefucked by Khabib at 155?
     
  5. UFCFreak89 White Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2017
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought he did really well in round 1 of the khabib fight.
     
  6. PaleMoonlight Green Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,478
    Likes Received:
    261
    His touch butt training puts him above average:

    Weathered storm against last minute Mendes

    Lasted longer than Porier against Kabob.

    Vato Diaz had hard time with takedown in 2nd fight. Diaz was bigger than him too.
     
  7. Crom Cruach Brown Belt

    Joined:
    May 30, 2018
    Messages:
    2,859
    Likes Received:
    1,111
    The two world class grapplers he faced sliced through his TDD with ease.

    He has fought mostly strikers.
     
  8. Spath Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    5,904
    Likes Received:
    2,256
    Location:
    Winland
    People compare his striking to his ground game, which is why they think it’s not good. He’s a damn good striker and his striking is obviously better than his grappling.

    His grappling isn’t bad by any means. I’d say that there are plenty of guys in the UFC who he could outgrapple, but as he would also get squished by some elite grapplers he’s not seen as a very crafted grappler. There aren’t too many guys who could just fight him standing and beat him.

    Pettis has very good BJJ and is very dangerous on the ground. Nate Diaz tooled him and made it look easy... So getting handled on the ground against Diaz (and Khabib) is... normal. Is normal.

    :eek:
     
  9. THE BMF Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2020
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lima
    Yea we seen that Conor has a decent clinch game, tdd against Eddie and solid bjj game is his sweep of Diaz and keeping khabib brutal GNP neutralised in round 1 but he doesn’t have an aggressive sub game especially of his back I don’t think I have every seen him through up a submission which is bad for a bjj brown belt, and when fights go on he gets taken down easier as seen by khabib.

    He is too divisive a figure to have a genuine discussion about his skills on here i have found out.

    Btw I’ll give your video a watch in a bit I am subscribed.
     
  10. Drugstore Cowboy

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2018
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    1,762
    Location:
    Central Europe
    Superb clincher (one of the best ever), positionally outstanding, well equipped with sweeps and passing, nearly impossible to submit while fresh.
     
  11. Furious77 Tell dat bitch to be cool.

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    Messages:
    6,857
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Cali
    Its just average. It doesn't stand out from anyone else in his division.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2020
  12. Moral Victory Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    5,845
    Likes Received:
    392
    He is a pretty good grappler.

    Even long ago when he tore his (acl?) Against Max and had to resort to wrestling and grappling he did really good, very slick, go watch it.

    People think he has bad grappling but its because he is usually put in those bad positions when he's fatigued, which is his real weakness.
     
  13. superpunch Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2015
    Messages:
    19,388
    Likes Received:
    2,752
    His ground game -- like his BJJ -- isn't bad. His problem is that he has very bad wresting for championship level fights. Other strikers like Aldo have much better TDD. That means that non-manlet championship level grapplers will grapple fuck him all day.
     
  14. Aberlour Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2016
    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    145
    He's been submitted twice in the first round.
     
  15. Xoleth Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2019
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    1,881
    It's a myth.
    He has decent grappling.
    Khabib needed 4 rounds to finish him.
    Eddie, who is considered a good grappler here, I don't know why, couldn't take him down and beat him on the ground (I remember he tried)
     
  16. SharpasaRazor Yellow Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    127
    His grappling overall between BJJ and TDD is decent.

    I think when people say for instance that Cowboy wants to try and get him on the ground that is conflated with saying he’s dire there. When actually it’s about the fact that for someone with high level ground game you would clearly rather be there with him than in boxing range.

    In short it is an aspect of his game where he competent but not outstanding, maybe TDD excepted, while his striking is phenomenal.
     
  17. ftpngo Green Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2017
    Messages:
    1,253
    Likes Received:
    55
    Connor is a decent grappler who at times vunerable to being held down by high level wrestlers. Connor's problem is his cardio.

    Anderson was a high level striker with a good ground game who is vunerable to being held down by elite wrestlers (very different styles). The difference is after second round Connor stops being dangerous.
     
  18. Oldman1 Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2019
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    121
    I'm not listening to these nerds
     
  19. Furious77 Tell dat bitch to be cool.

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2013
    Messages:
    6,857
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Cali
    Don't really get the Pettis comparison, Pettis is always in bad positions on the ground but he's never really been close to being subbed and he's reversed nearly everyone who's ever taken his back. How did he get "tooled"?
     
  20. Spath Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    5,904
    Likes Received:
    2,256
    Location:
    Winland
    It’s been some time since I watched that fight, but Nate kept passing, advancing and putting Pettis in bad positions. He landed some strikes on the ground too.

    I think Pettis gets usually put in bad positions on the ground by good wrestlers. Just like how Nate has lost some fights on the ground, against good/great wrestlers with strength to go with it.

    I think the point was that Nate has great jiu jitsu. People seem to think that losing to Nate on the ground means you’re not much of a grappler, which is simply not true.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.