- Joined
- Sep 23, 2013
- Messages
- 2,396
- Reaction score
- 0
I love Matt inside the octagon but sometimes when he talks it sounds like the heroin addicted he once was.
...on a mountain of stones? Is that some made-up saying to imply piling on?Matt who? Fuck you retard! Throwing stones on a mountain...
wasn't him a drug addict ?
Only fair if permanent bans are a known punishment before the perpetrator gets caught, not after.
I agree with this
But I think in these cases the UFC or commission or whoever should pay the camp of the suspended fighter for their pre-fight work and the rest of the money gets suspended. You should not make any profit for a fight you were on steroids for imo.
I agree, but all punishments must be known before a fight, not after.
If they say lifetime ban, full purse fine or both starting Nov 1st - then all fighters will know about the punishment and will have time to adjust.
I agree, you can't retroactive new punishments. I still think it is bullshit, particularly since the fight sucked and he didn't engage, but he basically got lucky on the timing. But yeah, if people could make rules retroactive they could tell someone on any violation "oh your 30 days suspension is now a lifetime ban, we changed the rule a week after you got caught and made it retroactive. We may change it back after we let it go!"
Maybe he's right. Lifetime bans would stop people from using. Might be more effective than better testing.
Alright, I bet a lot of fighters would just fight elsewhere, and Anderson is a draw, you can't ban him from MMA forever, you can only ban him from one org.
If he passes tests elsewhere and fights elsewhere that's bad for the UFC. Same goes for anyone.