Last i heard all charges were dismissed by the court.
looks like it...this was easy enough to find, thanks to public court records online.
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CourtSummaryReport.ashx?docketNumber=MC-51-CR-0017484-2016&dnh=zkf8eDcbeKZw04nV03tPQA==
The guy who got hit was literally asking the bouncer to hit him on a bet. There were prizes for whoever won the bet and a clear downside for whoever lost. The bouncer agreed to the bet. Verbal contract. I wish the guy weren't stupid enough to make that bet but you can't save everyone who begs for someone to give them an ass-whooping. I don't like it but it wasn't unfair.
are you sure? typically, illegal behaviour (such as assault) can't form part of a legal contract.
I would have assumed this fell under some murky self-defense or stand-your-ground law where the defense argued provocation or imminent threat (LOL - as if)
Grey area.
Asking someone to swing at you and placing bets is either legal or illegal (or somewhere inbetween-- it was more than legal 50 years ago and no new laws have been passed on it), but it was drafted and initiated by the guy in the grey so he would be the one to take the charges should there be any.
Also, I wasn't really talking concerning laws or the modern application of laws but the ethical side of it.
fair enough. even just 'ethically' though, I don't think drunk idiots who have been kicked out of bars by sober bouncers who are 2x their size should be held to any such 'contracts' though
Because he was trying to make a bet that if a bouncer tried to KO him with a punch, and missed, they would let him in the club.Why?