Mark Hunt is the new Frank Mir

[Magx951]

The idea that people "know" someone is on drugs without verifiable testing is dumb as fuck. That is why USADA is here, so bro-scientists like you can stop getting the two confused.

except for the fact that Brock has been caught with steroids before dummy

do some fucking research

What the hell did you expect hunt to say? "Nah I don't want the pay day or the fight because he's probably on roids". Then you would have gotten on him for turning a fight down. He is a fighter and he has to get himself up for the fight. If you know you're going into battle, even if the odds are against you, you would be either a coward or really stupid to put the opposition on a pedestal. A true fighter believes he can win no matter the circumstance. The mentality has to be right.

He should have complained about it from the start, if he cares so fucking much. He signed to take the fight, so either man up about it and face what you signed up for or fuck off tbh

 

[Deleted member 196663]

except for the fact that Brock has been caught with steroids before dummy

do some fucking research

So you think Brock getting caught with steroids in 2001 means you "know" he would test positive at any point after that?? Fucking bro-scientists...

 

[RemyR]

Hunt's got a very legit reason to be pissed. Props to him for it backing down on his stance on the whole thing

 

[Magx951]

So you think Brock getting caught with steroids in 2001 means you "know" he would test positive at any point after that?? Fucking bro-scientists...

the fact that he got caught with them in 2001 and 15 years later his body looks as good if not better?

Yeah. I'm starting to think you're trolling.

 

[Which Doctor]

1) Ever since the Honda & Connie Mac gravy trains have passsed through, leading up to the UFC sale, more and more fighters have been coming out looking for money in various ways (higher pay, call outs, superfights, etc).

A) Hunt had no visable/expressed outrage fighting "probably" juiced fighters in K-1 and PRIDE.
B) Hunt had no visable/expressed outrage fighting "probably" juiced fighters in UFC pre-USADA.
C) Hunt had no visable/expressed outrage when @KONE 's kangaroo popped hot.
D) Prior to Brock, Hunt complained about the exemption and how the UFC kept giving him these juiced-up fighters, and that if Brock gets an exemption he (Hunt) should be able to juice and not have to cut weight. But all that doesn't matter (as usual) because when they feel the punch, he'll just walk away (as usual). He signs the contract (as usual).
E) Brock comes in and gives Heath Hunt the old Hoyce Alger; fight looked like it could have taken place @ UFCs 12 - 17.
F) The Tears of Hunt era arrives: First Hunt demands half of Brocks money, then all, then says he wants to be released if he doesn't get his way. Hunt is in the beginning stages of a 6 fight multi-mil contract. If he gets this hush money from the UFC he could perceivably make his contracts worth w/ no more fights, get released and be free to fight in another org that is "friendlier to aged fighters". If he just gets released, he can still move to an org that is "friendlier to aged fighters". He goes on a hell bent hail mary social media tirade, as if he wants to be released so he can go fight in an org that is "friendlier to aged fighters".

WAR HUNTO - RIZIN HW/SHW CHAMP 2017!!!!

WAR HUNTO - GOING OVER BROCK @ WRESTLEMANIA 33 IN 2017!!!!


<7><7><7><7><7>

 

[Fraser B]

Except Brock never beat Hunt.

 

[Deleted member 196663]

the fact that he got caught with them in 2001 and 15 years later his body looks as good if not better?

Yeah. I'm starting to think you're trolling.

Do people like you become judges? God help anyone that has a criminal history. "Sir, you're on trial today for armed robbery. It says you have committed armed robbery in the past. I don't need to hear anything else. Guilty!"

 

[Magx951]

Do people like you become judges? God help anyone that has a criminal history. "Sir, you're on trial today for armed robbery. It says you have committed armed robbery in the past. I don't need to hear anything else. Guilty!"

that's not even a similar situation. Try harder.

 

[Deleted member 196663]

that's not even a similar situation. Try harder.

Your point is irrelevant. Bottom line is you can't tell the difference between knowing something and speculating about something. To say you "knew" Brock was currently on steroids because of an arrest years ago is fucking embarrassing.

 

[Magx951]

Your point is irrelevant. Bottom line is you can't tell the difference between knowing something and speculating about something. To say you "knew" Brock was currently on steroids because an arrest years ago is fucking embarrassing.

Humans can not naturally get to Brock Lesnar's muscle size and leanness, except (possibly) a ridiculously small amount of people with extreme genes. Factor that into him getting caught with steroids previously, and his body only getting MORE impressive, and you realize that it's obvious he's on steroids.

Even Hunt said he knew Brock was on roids, so why are you so adamant that it wasn't obvious? Why are you so desperately trying to seem smart?

 

[Deleted member 196663]

Humans can not naturally get to Brock Lesnar's muscle size and leanness, except (possibly) a ridiculously small amount of people with extreme genes. Factor that into him getting caught with steroids previously, and his body only getting MORE impressive, and you realize that it's obvious he's on steroids.

Even Hunt said he knew Brock was on roids, so why are you so adamant that it wasn't obvious? Why are you so desperately trying to seem smart?

In other words, you have a PhD in bro-science.

I don't know why you so desperately want to pass off your belief/opinion as fact. I guess you want your opinion to be more relevant? It doesn't make any sense.