Social Major Media Outlets Working Collaboratively with CIA in Reportings

Orgasmo

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Dec 13, 2013
Messages
13,247
Reaction score
5,554
Isn't the job of a free press to question and hold government agencies to account? Having CIA handlers screen and pre-approve their articles seems a bit contradictory to that goal.
A prominent national security reporter for the Los Angeles Times routinely submitted drafts and detailed summaries of his stories to CIA press handlers prior to publication, according to documents obtained by The Intercept.

Email exchanges between CIA public affairs officers and Ken Dilanian, now an Associated Press intelligence reporter who previously covered the CIA for the Times, show that Dilanian enjoyed a closely collaborative relationship with the agency, explicitly promising positive news coverage and sometimes sending the press office entire story drafts for review prior to publication. In at least one instance, the CIA’s reaction appears to have led to significant changes in the story that was eventually published in the Times.

Dilanian’s emails were included in hundreds of pages of documents that the CIA turned over in response to two FOIA requests seeking records on the agency’s interactions with reporters. They include email exchanges with reporters for the Associated Press, Washington Post, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and other outlets. In addition to Dilanian’s deferential relationship with the CIA’s press handlers, the documents show that the agency regularly invites journalists to its McLean, Va., headquarters for briefings and other events. Reporters who have addressed the CIA include the Washington Post‘s David Ignatius, the former ombudsmen for the New York Times, NPR, and Washington Post, and Fox News’ Brett Baier, Juan Williams, and Catherine Herridge.
The CIA’s Mop-Up Man: L.A. Times Reporter Cleared Stories With Agency Before Publication (theintercept.com)
 
Is it major media outlets as a whole or just certain journalists doing it on their own behalf? We already know that journalists and news organizations work with politicians they want to win elections.
 
Sounds like a career ender, or what should be. And a well deserved one. Flagrantly unprofessional for a journalist.
 
Operation Mockingbird

In a 1977 Rolling Stone magazine article, "The CIA and the Media,"[6] reporter Carl Bernsteinexpanded upon the Church Committee's report and said that around 400 press members were considered intelligence assets by the CIA, including New York Times publisher Arthur Hays Sulzberger, columnist and political analyst Stewart Alsop and Time magazine.[5]Berstein documented the way in which overseas branches of major US news agencies had for many years served as the "eyes and ears" of Operation Mockingbird, which functioned to disseminate CIA propaganda through domestic US media.[7]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
 
Isn't the job of a free press to question and hold government agencies to account? Having CIA handlers screen and pre-approve their articles seems a bit contradictory to that goal.

The CIA’s Mop-Up Man: L.A. Times Reporter Cleared Stories With Agency Before Publication (theintercept.com)

Fuck me, every time I see someone announce this like its new news, I want to slap someone.

That's what the conspiracy loons mean when they say the media is government controlled.
Always has been. And no one gives a shit, they just keep assuming everything they see on the news is true.

Oh BTW, covid is a scam. And Ukraine isn't really being attacked like they say it is..
 
Last edited:
Lol the intercept, that's not a credible source, that is a football play.

I don't not support this thing.
 
The mainstream media is the biggest joke running. The fact that there are still people out there that put their trust in them is astonishing.
This is amusing, if only because vast amounts of people who hate the mainstream media for lying also will go to their grave believing things Donald Trump says.
<DirkMavs>
 
I know, right. We, aka those that can actually think figured that out a while ago. This is clear as day and should be troubling to everyone. As intelligence agencies don’t need that many people on their side to effectively run things, soon basically everybody will be an outsider. That means spacey them running things and we have to deal with it
 
Is it no surprise the CIA gets a bunch of undisclosed funding with this rushed bill for the 40 billion to Ukraine? Think of all the propaganda in the news media related to that lol
 
Back
Top