There is a special place in Hell for Madelline Albright.
The sanctions against Iraq under Saddam Hussein killed over half a million Iraqi children. When she was asked whether it was worth it , she replied it was worth it.
You think there aren't any elites in Western society that have the greatest say in foreign policy decisions.
Bernie was against the Iraq war while Hillary was for it. Hillary lost the 2008 nomination because she was for the Iraq war and Obama was against it.
Hillary was 1 f the parties pushing for the US to bomb Libya and she has been supportive of the US getting involved in Syria. Hillary is pro war.
Hmm by your logic
"Bernie supports killing little children with drone strikes."
"Bernie supports the "evil zionist state" and turns a blind eye to Saudi Arabia violence"
I mean if you want me to play it that far and like an idiot I can. Just so you know by the way true socialists dislike Sanders because they claim he represents 'statism' with capitalism. Why did I mention that? Because you are starting to state the same stuff that hardcore 'socialists' and "non-interventionists" like to spew. And if that is the case then I thought id return fire with what they say about Bernie Sanders.
Or if you want to go the conspiracy route check this out it might appeal to all the infowars fans
1) Iraq was a mistake but for 100th million time I don't fault her or Joe Biden or anyone for making that vote especially when they were U.S. Senators and were shown faulty/false evidence by the Bush administration. You know that Senators meet in private with the administration and their sources right? Plus she later came out against Iraq as did Kerry.
2) Don't be ridiculous she lost 2008 because Obama ran a better campaign all around, had more charisma, and had more crossover appeal to other demographics. Hillary was called "too left" and Obama did not run on a platform of extreme liberalism.
3) Bernie supported intervention in Libya. And it was the right call
4) She supports just like Sanders a multilateral and united plan to deal with Syria she does not support the same things Republicans want. Nor does she support nuking Iran. Although, personally I think the Iran deal will blow up in our face later.
Are you serious? I don't like the vague allusions to "elites," but do you really think that Bush's aid of the coup d'etat or Obama's campaign against Gaddafi was ideological or based at all on national security or actual human rights concerns?
It was.
Libya was a human rights concern which is why France, Canada, the UK and even other EU nations got on board. You mean to tell me that "big bad evil America' somehow convinced them all to do/go against their own interests? Libya was a multilateral intervention with UN security council approval (narrow but still) and got the support of most of the free thinking world. It was completely different than Iraq in which not even NATO was on board and which Bush told France to f#ck off and the UN and invaded anyways.