Law Machine guns now legal without atf stamp or pre 1986

HockeyBjj

Putting on the foil
Staff member
Senior Moderator
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
32,347
Reaction score
44,701


Forced reset triggers aren’t like bump stocks, where the trigger is pulled and released each shot to keep it semi automatic. Forced reset have the trigger hammer reset itself while the trigger is still pulled that first time by the shooter. Physically operates different than a traditional machine gun but the same thing of one trigger pull and the gun shooting til you let go or empty the mag.

Available for both handguns and ARs, I’m sure about any semi auto gun someone will have an aftermarket for it now



^legally a semi automatic now
 
It's one trigger pull per round, not a machine gun. Also there are no 'handguns' with FRTs. These go in ARs and PCCs that accept drop in triggers from the AR platform. It also doesn't work on every gun and requires a bit of tuning and know how.
 
It's one trigger pull per round, not a machine gun. Also there are no 'handguns' with FRTs. These go in ARs and PCCs that accept drop in triggers. It also doesn't work on every gun and requires a bit of tuning and know how.
It does take some tuning, but they do work for handguns as well. And it’s not one trigger pull per round. One trigger pull and the trigger keeps resetting the hammer internally to fire automatically from that one trigger pull

 
It does take some tuning, but they do work for handguns as well. And it’s not one trigger pull per round. One trigger pull and the trigger keeps resetting the hammer internally to fire automatically from that one trigger pull


No clue on the glock one, it can't work like the FRTs from ARs because those are utilitizing the operation of the bolt to reset the trigger. Glocks obviously don't have bolts so idk if that gun from the video is using the return of the slide to reset the trigger or what.

Either way a fully auto handgun is stupid anyway. I'd rather be in an active shooter situation with an idiot using a glock with a switch versus someone with the bare minimum shooting skills using semi-auto. Full auto is way over blown when it comes to danger. Talk to most people that have served in the military with time behind ARs, they rarely using full auto to begin with. Someone with training that is a propper shooter is going to do much more damage using semi-auto controlled fire.
 
No clue on the glock one, it can't work like the FRTs from ARs because those are utilitizing the operation of the bolt to reset the trigger. Glocks obviously don't have bolts so idk if that gun from the video is using the return of the slide to reset the trigger or what.

Either way a fully auto handgun is stupid anyway. I'd rather be in an active shooter situation with an idiot using a glock with a switch versus someone with the bare minimum shooting skills using semi-auto. Full auto is way over blown when it comes to danger. Talk to most people that have served in the military with time behind ARs, they rarely using full auto to begin with. Someone with training that is a propper shooter is going to do much more damage using semi-auto controlled fire.
I think the 3-shot burst is a pretty good compromise between accuracy and volume.
 
Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. “And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety.”

How is this enhancing public safety?

Because legal gun owners aren't the problem in America. And now they have better means to defend themselves.
 
No clue on the glock one, it can't work like the FRTs from ARs because those are utilitizing the operation of the bolt to reset the trigger. Glocks obviously don't have bolts so idk if that gun from the video is using the return of the slide to reset the trigger or what.

Either way a fully auto handgun is stupid anyway. I'd rather be in an active shooter situation with an idiot using a glock with a switch versus someone with the bare minimum shooting skills using semi-auto. Full auto is way over blown when it comes to danger. Talk to most people that have served in the military with time behind ARs, they rarely using full auto to begin with. Someone with training that is a propper shooter is going to do much more damage using semi-auto controlled fire.

Switch on the glizzy is pretty irrelevant in this topic since the guys putting switches on glizzies aren't legal gun owners anyway.
 
Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. “And we are glad to end a needless cycle of litigation with a settlement that will enhance public safety.”

How is this enhancing public safety?
How else are we supposed to protect ourselves from lunatic tesla fire bombers. Its not like we can rely on Judges to protect us from these tesla terrorists.
 
Because legal gun owners aren't the problem in America. And now they have better means to defend themselves.
True, but most dudes buying FRTs are getting them for fucking around at the range and having a good time. Most sensible gun owners aren't going to start blasting at those firing rates at a home intruder or something.
 


I have literally given no fucks about what the ATF decrees through chevron for about 8 years. Once they started wanting fingerprints for guns in my Trust I just said fuck it.

I've had FRT for years.

That first run is my suppressed 300 BO SBR running subsonics with an FRT. Gets expensive quickly. But that batch of subs cycles everything.
 
Back
Top