- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 22,256
- Reaction score
- 70
U wot m8
I'd say Warbrandt's striking is better than Conor's as well but hey.. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
:>
U wot m8
I'm not a fan of Luke and I'm not a fan of Conor. Explain how I am biased, please.
I will go get myself some coffee in the meantime. This is gonna be interesting.
Who said you're a fan of Luke? I said you're a hater.
You probably just hate Conor more than Luke.
Either that or you're simply a moron. I gave you the benefit of a doubt and therefore assumed you're a salty hater, be thankful.
Conor hasn't been outstruck in a single round except the second round with Diaz when he gassed.
He became the FW champion with a horrible TDD and a poor bottom game, that alone says something about his ability to strike.
How can you actually say Luke's striking is better? Please, I want to hear your detailed analysis.
I'm not a hater either. As I said, everything is not black or white. You're a part of the pussified world where one can't criticize or simply say something about another
without being a "hater". I think Cody Garbrandt is a much more better striker than Conor as well. Does that trigger you even more?
You can criticize as much as you like, but if you want to be taken seriously, at least make some sense.
You still haven't explained how Luke's striking is better.
And Cody? Who knows? He might be.
I'll make up my mind after I'll see more of him.
To be fair, Conor and Luke both got nailed by the left hooks in that combo. Conor's chin survived, Luke's didn't.
Bisping threw that combo taking advantage of he fact that Luke was in close and off balance, while Aldo threw the combo at a moment when Conor was poised, balanced, and ready for him.
Wasn't just over commitment to his jab. He didn't bring back his jab to his face to protect his right side. It was lazy defence.