- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 7,361
- Reaction score
- 3,790
At one point, this dude was one of the best fighters in the UFC. A shame, really.
He lost the belt 5 years ago, and he has 1 win since.
I hear the argument that maybe he's got something still left in the tank and that may be true, but Marvin is on the verge of a title shot and you can't have guys like Luke jumping the line.
If Luke gets anyone down in the top 10 it's over for them but his takedowns aren't all that great and Till still can put people down, normally he just can't finish them. With Rockhold, I doubt that will be an issue. The elbow he delivered to Whittaker would be enough IMO.Till has recently turned into a point fighter, doesn't go for Ko's much anymore. Not to mention if Luke gets him down its likely game over
why not? People do it all the time lol, Chandler is pretty close to a title shot and he's beat Dan Hooker. He wasn't even champ in Bellator when he left.
This is a good fight even if it doesn't really make "sense" in terms of where Luke stands right now. Luke has shown in the past he is championship level, Vettori can fight him, get a big named W with a really good performance, and they can cut Luke n not pay him big bucks. It's a win win.
If Luke somehow wins, well, you have perhaps another intriguing contender in the division.
Weird how people say you can't have people jumping the line when people literally jump the line ALL the time.
And let's not act as if he's being kO'd by bums, he was KO'd at 205 vs Jan (the champ) and Yoel. The last middle of the pack fighter he fought (to be fair he did get rocked during it) was vs Branch and he won.
Edit, it can be Till, I'm fine with him fighting the loser of the bout.
I don't think that the loser of Vettori-Till versus him is a bad fight, I just think that it's unfair to the guy who has to take it. If Till loses and is moved all the way down to fringe 15ish, then maybe.
As has been mentioned in this thread, Luke doesn't really mean much at 185 at this point. His recent (and even saying "recent" is a stretch) losses have aged somewhat ok.... but the problem is his wins are all ancient. The only guy in the current top 15 in any weight that he's ever beaten is Weidman. Other than being an ex-champ he just has nothing current on his resume.
I do get what you're saying in that it's a good fight in that it's interesting. And yes, I'd look forward to Luke-Till more than 90% of the dreck they throw out there. But Rockhold is so low on the totem pole right now and there's very little longterm upside in him as an asset to the UFC.
You want Costa to get humped again?Lol feed him to Costa
IMO being a former champ (and it wasn’t THAT long ago) warrants a reasonable showcase. Doesn’t have to be Till, but it shouldn’t be a total no name either IMO.
I definitely wouldn’t go higher than Till (if he loses), Kelvin or Jack. Jacare or Weidman rematches wouldn’t be bad. Tavares or Heinisch at the absolutely worst.
I don't disagree with any of this, but the way Rockhold is wording it makes it seem like he feels like he's in the mix for the winner of Till-Vettori, which is a bridge too far. Till coming off a loss or Gastelum is fine.
If Holland were to lose to Brunson then Holland vs Rockhold feels like the perfect fight.