- Joined
- Jul 7, 2012
- Messages
- 28,197
- Reaction score
- 24,864
Read Graham Hancock's book Underworld for more on this subject
He's the fake history guy right?
Nope. He's the guy that looks at evidence that could possibly turn the current paradigm on its head, presents it in a thought-provoking form, and challenges the career historians whose entire life would be for naught if their history turned out untrue. Naturally they are hesitant to change.
I think speculative historian is more accurate. His niche is theory, not necessarily fact.He's the fake history guy right?
Oh I thought he was the guy that came up with theories and only looked for evidence to support them while ignoring all other evidence.