Translation: you were duped by chode rogaine's "analysis"; gotcha.
Maybe instead of taking what that roid-head says as gospel, you could listen to what khabib's own opponents say about him, his striking, and his defence: the guy is unorthodox, awkward, and unusual, but effective nonetheless.
It speaks volumes that a fight people want to point to as an example of how the eagle is "beatable" is one in which he absolutely dominated his opponent; meanwhile, we've got two glaring examples of conner's shit defensive grappling in just his two fights vs one of the worst wrestlers at lw, nate diaz. In the first fight he got taken down easily in the first round, then reversed, mounted and choked out in the second round. The second fight saw him taken down and mounted, then saved by the bell in the fifth. But this guy is going to defend takedowns vs the best wrestler the lw division has ever seen? Before you put your money on mc-g, maybe you'd first like to invest in some ocean-front real estate I've got available in idaho.