- Joined
- Jul 6, 2007
- Messages
- 19,967
- Reaction score
- 5,969
I have a legal question regarding fighters getting TUE's for TRT from the Athletic commissions.
Just because an AC decides to give a fighter a TUE for TRT or some other performance enhancer, does it then follow that the UFC is legally bound to have fighters taking TRT on it's roster.
Couldn't the UFC just take the position that they will not allow any fighters taking TRT for any reason to fight in the UFC?
I under$tnad there are Rea$on$ they might not choo$e to do that. My question is could they if they wanted to?
Maybe I do not have a good legal understanding of this, but I don't think there is any legal impediment to the UFC having stricter requirements than the Athletic commissions.
Does anyone with legal expertise have an opinion on this.
Just because an AC decides to give a fighter a TUE for TRT or some other performance enhancer, does it then follow that the UFC is legally bound to have fighters taking TRT on it's roster.
Couldn't the UFC just take the position that they will not allow any fighters taking TRT for any reason to fight in the UFC?
I under$tnad there are Rea$on$ they might not choo$e to do that. My question is could they if they wanted to?
Maybe I do not have a good legal understanding of this, but I don't think there is any legal impediment to the UFC having stricter requirements than the Athletic commissions.
Does anyone with legal expertise have an opinion on this.