- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 67,583
- Reaction score
- 118,541
I don't think they wanna be like you Puerto Ricans.![]()
I dont even have the energy to respond
The idiocy in this thread has caused me to lose my smile, maybe forever...
I don't think they wanna be like you Puerto Ricans.![]()
Texas isn't too bad either. It's number 8 and there is no state tax. Its why I'll never leave
Yeah, i suppose so.You mean like they originally were or something?
oh really?
![]()
Israel’s SMARTSHOOTER lands $13M U.S. Army contract for advanced fire control systems | CTech
Its SMASH 3000 system uses artificial intelligence, computer vision, and advanced tracking to help soldiers detect and eliminate aerial and ground targets.www.calcalistech.com
![]()
ICE Signs $2 Million Contract With Spyware Maker Paragon Solutions
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s one-year contract with Paragon’s US subsidiary comes amid the Biden administration’s years-long crackdown on commercial spyware vendors.www.wired.com
swing and a miss.
again, we literally already do. i don't know how to make this any clearer to you.
right they will all just pack up and leave when they all have all the leverage. amazing.
yeah joplin, missouri will become the new tech capital of the world. sure thing brother.
[citation needed]
California is about 25-38 percent desert, depending on how you define it.
Only about 10-15% of their water is imported from outside the state (and that is virtually all from the Colorado River, as discussed).
Like I said in my previous post, these companies make up 1-2% of California's GDP. It's not as devastating as you're trying to make it out to be.
Do you think California would be incapable of providing tax incentives of their own?
If the US had the same debt per capita as California, it would only be $4 trillion in debt instead of $33 trillion. lol
Compared to most other first world nations, $270 billion in debt for a population of 40 million is not bad. They'd have to increase their debt per capita by a factor of 8 to get to US government levels of debt.
Again, like with water needs, this is a challenge, but not remotely insurmountable. Even with their current programs they're more or less on pace to become clean-energy independent within the next 20 years or so. If needed, that could be expedited—and they could expand their current fossil fuel programs in the interim to help bridge that gap.
Already went over this.
All true things, but none of which are out of the realm of possibility.
I married a mexican and 3 mixed kids. Im a fan... whats your point? Even my in-laws family dont want illegals to compete for their jobs. 1 in 8 or 10 was illegal when I first moved to Texas in 2001. There is something to the strategy or why else leave it all open. No clue. But obviously too much unfettered immigration hurts. There is always a balanceKnow what else Texas doesn't have?
A white majority
![]()
Sherfronters have assured me that this spells complete and total doom because no one will work, everyone's on welfare, you gotta press 1 for English, too many Mexican flags on pickup trucks, etc.
Yet Texas also keeps chugging along somehow.
Extremely puzzling!
It will move if the moving cost is enough, and it would have to be quite high given that America isn't the only market for US tech.Labor will move if the companies are moving. And the companies will be forced to move if something as drastic as California seceding happens.
They have and they aren't Apple, Microsoft or FAANG sized. It's too hard and expensive to move tens of thousands of high skill and in demand laborers.No but several companies have relocated their headquarters to Texas and offered incentives. No it's not easy and building a talent pool to choose from when a lot of it is already in one location meaning Silicon Valley is another problem. Even Exxon put their Global headquarters in Houston now. And several companies have put their stock in Texas. Just keeping the same pay.... cost of living is 40-45% cheaper so you give a lot of incentives.
- I hope they do. If they do i wil invade.The US isn't gonna leave the west coastline in the hands of a bunch of limp wristed Californians to defend.
It will move if the moving cost is enough, and it would have to be quite high given that America isn't the only market for US tech.
Again, there's a reason Silicon Valley has remained the hub of tech even though living costs are so high.
My point is there's a trend of relocating. I can't say for sure how the story ends. And if making yourself a new country will encourage thatThey have and they aren't Apple, Microsoft or FAANG sized. It's too hard and expensive to move tens of thousands of high skill and in demand laborers.
And? Transactions aren't a one way relationship, just as entire markets are entirely substitutable, neither are providers and sellers.Most American tech companies largest customer base (by revenue) is the US itself.
There is somewhat, but not a wholesale trend in moving the actual expensive labor. Like I said, Apple has dragged its feet on Research Triangle, and that's one of the most highly educated regions in the country.My point is there's a trend of relocating. I can't say for sure how the story ends. And if making yourself a new country will encourage that
No they wouldn't be better off. To believe that reveals a complete lack of critical thinking.
1. A large portion of California is desert and the state relies on importing water from the Colorado River. They wouldn't have access to this as a separate country.
2. Everyone loves to say how California has The world's 5th largest economy. Yes, California's GDP is better than many countries out there. They always seem to forget that a lot California's economic output is because it is in the United States. Federal contracts with defense, space, and technology companies add a lot to that GDP. If California were no longer a part of the Union, many of those contractors would follow the federal money and leave.
3. Then you have issue of businesses in California, many of them would choose to leave as well, because they would like to remain in the United States, have access to the 290 million Americans that don't live in California, without additional tariffs, fees and other encumbrances. Silicon Valley, and venture capitalists (which gives California a lot of tax revenue) would likely bail as well. Apple and all the tech companies would move.
4. That's not even mentioning the number of people who would rather remain citizens of The United States rather than become Citizens of the new Country of California and leave for points east. I have no clue as to how many it would be, certainly not everyone but it also wouldn't be an insignificant number either. Even polls say 20% of the people feel more American than Californian and only 30% said they feel more California than American, with the other half of the respondents feeling equally Californian and American.
5. California has difficulty balancing the budget now, while getting 33% of the budget from the feds. That is without having to secure their own borders, provide for their own defense, Many of the programs and policies that inspire the California should secede movement, would almost immediately be on the chopping block. Revenues and spending would have to be massively changed, or California would rapidly turn into a failed state.
Tax revenues lost from businesses and individuals (families) leaving, along with the loss of a serious chunk of the budget (from fed dollars) would quickly determine the need for reprioritization of expenditures. Now California would have to pay for military personnel, equipment; their own border patrol, their own intelligence agency, their own diplomatic infrastructure. They'd lose access to the FBI, DEA, etc.... How long until cartels move in and take charge of large territories the same way that they have in Mexico and other countries?
California, IIRC, pays 100 billion more to the Federali than they receive so not sure your point there. They're also the 4th largest economy in the world and 1 in 8 Americans is Californian. So on. It would fuck over the rest of the country, particularly red statesI believe this was settled awhile back with that war and the Supreme Court ruling.
Just for fun if they did you secure the border to California and raise the prove of their water and electricity by 75% to make up any lose in revenue. You remove all fedural funds and programs including boarder control. Give a free pass out to illegals that want to go their.
Within 2 months the state would look like escape from NY.
Tacos belong in corn tortillas. Stop being a canImagine eating breakfast tacos or Cali burritos with corn tortillas lol.
California, IIRC, pays 100 billion more to the Federali than they receive so not sure your point there. They're also the 4th largest economy in the world and 1 in 8 Americans is Californian. So on. It would fuck over the rest of the country, particularly red states
Could. There's a lot of "could" you're leaving out like their contributions to the country which are massive and not easily replaced. Again, 4th largest economy in the world. As far as the border, it'd be their border with Mexico so I don't know how the Federali closes that being that Cali would be a sovereign nation. The surplus they pay to the Federali which subsidizes other states would reinvested. They'd certainly have to solve the electricity issue but that would also depend on their relations with the US, in which certain states, btw, get electricity from Canada.We would do just fine and could make up any money needed with charges for services they need to survive. Or we could just cut off their water and electricity. Then opening the boarder one way to them for illegals. No federal contracts for any business and other state government would be able to do business with them. Then we raise the import tax on any goods they try to ship in. That's just a start.
This however can not happen as I stated.