Usually if the younger fighter beats the older fighter, then in a rematch they´ll only win more dominantly, that combined with Gmabort seeming calm and collected and parker a bit of a nutcase, was close to betting Gmarot or staying away, parker from the old fights, value. This Parker was pathetic ,no gameplan, kept doing the same, couldn´t had lost much worse. Can try and justify that he looked good earlier, and blah blah blah, truth is bet lost, could it be avoided. For me think I´ll put much more stock into youth vs older fighters, and especailly the calm collected fighters. Seen this so many times now. Hard to say if value on Gamrot, I know he looked like a -500 here, but just because they look good doesnt mean they are i.e a KO fighter Koing within 1 minute will look like a supoer massive fav even if not true.
But really gotta put stock into the younger fighter doing a repeat, we see it over and over, and they only win more dominantly. Definitely will keep in mind. In my simulations/tracking, it definittely seems like ti´ll be worth it more often than not in terms of profit.
Wrsosek, close fight. He messed up in round 3 by going for a TD himself when he should had pushed the pace even if he was tired. Round 2, he lost due to the TD, very close fight though, I feel the bet was justified here, it is what it is.
No value on parker though. At least got to do a bit of arbitrage earlier when Gamrot was 1.63 and Parker 2.85. Not much only like 0,1U but I´ll take it to cover this bet.
Youth vs age, more dominant. Keep in mind. Moving on to the next one. Lets get ufc 251.