I love how posters talk about "control" so much and don't even realize what it is.
So we just consider holding on to an opponent control? What about Rampage controlling the entire fight outside of the time Mo was holding on for dear life?
If Mo is on top of Rampage he's winning the fight, but if Rampage is stalking MO and controlling the stand up it counts for nothing.
If Mo is going to get credit for having control of Rampage with doing absolutely no damage, then Rampage should get credit for controlling the stand up when he wasn't dealing out the damage. If Rampage gets no credit for controlling the stand up when he wasn't doing damage, then Mo shouldn't get credit for controlling the grappling when he wasn't doing damage.
Can't go both ways.
Drives me crazy how MMA is scored based more as a game, then an actual fight. MMA fans have gotten so used to terrible judging, they now judge that way themselves. It's fucking embarrassing. Winning the actual fight counts less than winning the game now a days.