Khamzat Chimaev or Jon Jones - Who has the more impressive first 14 fights?

[IneedSometop]

It’s important to remember that jones was also doing all this while he like 21-23 years old he hadn’t even come into his physical prime yet

 

[John Creed]

In terms of perfection, Khamzat has yet to lose. Both had solid wins before their 15th fights though.

Jon Jones is also yet to lose.

 

[VinceArch]

Jon Jones is also yet to lose.

Just like Fedor's first loss, it's there.

 

[deadshot138]

Jon Jones and it’s not even close.

Jones was brutally finishing guys.

Khamzat struglledmwitj Burns and Usman.

Did you have a stroke mid sentence?

 

[anachronist]

I consider Jon Jones the GOAT not because he beat old men Shoun and Rampage, but because just f'ing watch him fight ... he's a unique blend of out worldly athleticism, smartness, heart, confidence and raw fighting skills...A lot of "legends" , that Jon Jones beat were past their primes. You fixate on records are not judgng fighters correctly. Prime BJ Penn, in his prime, when he could box, had incredible balance and awesome ground game, was a thing of beauty ..one of the best , but his record sucks, worse than almost anyone...Ofcourse records have a correlation (or even causation) with competence, but they can be misleasding too..

 

[FreddieRoachsVoice]

Shogun's chin was a hell of a lot more proven than Whittaker's wrestling. Also, Jones had never noticeably gassed or even had a moment of vulnerability. Jones easily

 

[FreddieRoachsVoice]

Just like Fedor's first loss, it's there.

Spoken like a true Wikipedia fan

 

[VinceArch]

Spoken like a true Wikipedia fan

Scathing.

 

[snaportap21]

I feel that response, my bad that came out wrong. Khamzat beat 2 world champs while Jones beat only 1. I meant no disrespect to shogun .

 

[Shaolin Alan]

If you look at their level of activity it's not even close. Jones was fighting 3-4 times a year. Khamzat is a pull out merchant.

Jon became champion in 3 years while still in his early 20s.

Khamzat's had 6 years and is in his 30s.

How is this even a question?

Jon Jones 14 fights to in under >3 years
Khamzat 6.5 years and counting... Still nada

These Jones hate threads continue to smell

 

[Iroh]

Khamzat didn't have to eye poke any of them, if I'm not mistaken, so Khamzat's fights

 

[hoevan]

If we’re going strictly based off names, I’d give the edge to Khamzat based of the weight of holding wins over Usman and Whittaker. But in terms of accomplishments, Jones secured the belt as the youngest champ ever within those first 14 fights. Hard to top that.

Jon also got shoed in for a title shot over Rashad. I gotta go with Khamzat, he's fought in two divisions as well.

 

[TheNinja]

This isn't even close. It's Jones.

 

[JonnyBonesPharmacist]

What is this poll? Some kind of joke?

Bones.....not even close

 

[Gabe]

At that exact time? Khamzat. Jones next 7-8 fights will 100% be better than his.

 

[Gabe]

This isn't even close. It's Jones.

The real question is will Khamzats next five wins be as good as Rampage, Machida, Rashad, Vitor, and Sonnen? And Gus, Glover, and DC as six, seven, and eight?

 

[Gregoire1]

First 14 fights

Jones

gap

Chimaev
DC
Topuria

gap

Khabib

 

[Wilmer Digreux]

Khamzat really, but shogun might tip it for jones with a lotta people

 

[Mike]

How are people saying khamzat. Beating the current champ and becoming world champion is better than beating a former champ.

 

[Adamant]

Both 14-0. I lean towards Khamzat for being more of an animal, but JJ was super impressive too.