I fundamentally disagree. A dominant win is better than a competitive win full stop. Quality Wins matter and losses should never be ignored. You either look at everything or you look at nothing.
That's how I've always looked at it. Khabib's was better fighter imo but lacked the longevity, however his 13 fighters was still impressive. Aldo's latter years at 145 hurt him a good bit. Losing wasn't a huge deal because of who he was fighting deal but the way he was losing was rough.
Khabib cuz LW was the stronger div during their respective time and throughout. But Aldo was on top for way longer to offset that. Close. Khabib for the strength of the LW class, both nearing the top 5.
I don't agree. This isn't golf. There are consequences to staying in this too long. I think Khabib, GSP and Jones are smart to get out at the right time. GSP was even smarter in that he came back to fight a weak champion in another weight class. I give it to Khabib since he fought his whole career, never lost and never even got hurt or a scratch.Aldo was on a like 9x title fight win streak at the age Khabib retired at. I'm not even sure how this is up for debate.
Fight long enough and every fighter will eventually go on a decline. Oh and if you don't fight long enough, pardon us for not ranking you anywhere near the top
Edgar was the LW champ in most people's eyes when Aldo beat him. Two of Khabib's best wins are against guys who made their name at FW. The current LW champ was a guy who couldn't make it to a title shot at FW.
You can argue that LW has more good fighters, but the quality of the very best fighters at FW, which is what Aldo was fighting for nearly a decade as the defending champion, was clearly similar.
No one thought FW was a good div in 2010 (pre-UFC) or 2012. Everyone thought LW was one of the best divs. WW and LW. Early Jones era LHW contenders. Those were the topics of back then. LW's were moving down to FW when they lost, that was part of it.
I don't think Oliveira is a good example. He's clearly improved. Could be FW champ today as well, depending on how strong you rate Volk.
Florian was one fight removed from contesting for the LW belt when Aldo schooled him. Edgar was arguably the LW champ when Aldo beat him (and he did that twice). Then you have top FWs who also has top level success at LW.
Like I said, the top guys in both divisions were pretty neck Is neck in skills, and the top guys are pretty much all that matters in the context of this discussion because that's all Aldo was fighting.
I think who you beat to get a title shot matters as well. Florian and Edgar beat no one at FW. Mendes beat Lentz and Elkins. After already losing to Aldo by KO.
These are the topics of back then, like said. When a consensus is established it's useless to come back with revisionisms 10 years later.
We're arguing two different things man. I agree that LW was the better division. I just don't agree that it's relevant when comparing khabib and Aldo because their key wins are against the best of their divisions, and we've seen how the bests of these two divisions compare to each other it's been pretty even.
I don't understand. How are their divisions not relevant to where they stood or stand today? I think it's the most important thing. Of course contenders vs depth is another thing. In the long run they're the same, but some divisions are top heavy with talent. For LW vs FW though FW didn't have that chance. It was a new division, which erases both. LW can have both, if you get what I mean.
I'd say Khabib is higher and rank him at #5 all-time.
Inspired by this thread.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/khabib-defended-his-belt-3-times-aldo-10.4204615/
I don't understand. How are their divisions not relevant to where they stood or stand today? I think it's the most important thing. Of course contenders vs depth is another thing. In the long run they're the same, but some divisions are top heavy with talent. For LW vs FW though FW didn't have that chance. It was a new division, which erases both. LW can have both, if you get what I mean.