- Joined
- Dec 9, 2012
- Messages
- 31,931
- Reaction score
- 15,924
His foot was a balewnTake this info and match it with the fact that khabib was injured.
It's truly impressive
His foot was a balewnTake this info and match it with the fact that khabib was injured.
It's truly impressive
Knee but sureHis foot was a balewn
kamal shalorus isnt consider meaningful imoNo, since joining the UFC he has a 50% finish rate. And of his last 6 opponents he finished 4. His finish rate is actually increasing.
Seems more like you just want to remove one win so your argument works. But whatever.kamal shalorus isnt consider meaningful imo
tibau on the other hand has many meaningful wins
rda, stephens
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamal_Shalorus
3 loses out of 3 matches in the ufc
Couldn't finish a part time fighter with 3 submission lossesSeems more like you just want to remove one win so your argument works. But whatever.
In his recent fights he's been finishing much more often. Khabib over the past 3-4 years has been a finished more often than not
He did say he wanted to go 5 rounds,BTW he finished a full time killer in Porier in 3rd and another part timer in 4th.Couldn't finish a part time fighter with 3 submission losses
Neither could the guy with the most finishes in the UFC or the guy with an over 80% finish ratio.Couldn't finish a part time fighter with 3 submission losses
yes but not for the argumentSeems more like you just want to remove one win so your argument works. But whatever.
In his recent fights he's been finishing much more often. Khabib over the past 3-4 years has been a finished more often than not
By why ignore one of his finishes. It is just silly.yes but not for the argument
if u look at his last 9 u will come up with the argument that he is usually win the decision
it will be stupid to say something like that without looking first at the stats
6/11
Couldn't finish a part time fighter with 3 submission losses
So u have an opinion about me ignoring his first fightBy why ignore one of his finishes. It is just silly.
6/12
4/6
However you want to look at it, Khabib is increasing his finish rate as time goes on.
Kamal was 3-0-1 in the WEC. Would have been 4-0 against Varner without the point deduction. He went into the Khabib fight as a 7-1 fighter. Only loss was to prime Miller.So u have an opinion about me ignoring his first fight
I already mentioned that this fight was against 0-3 opponent
Ok u are right and i am wrongKamal was 3-0-1 in the WEC. Would have been 4-0 against Varner without the point deduction. He went into the Khabib fight as a 7-1 fighter. Only loss was to prime Miller.
Kamal was a good fighter who got fed to wolves too early. Miller, Khabib, and RDA were his 3 fights. None of those are bad losses.
It's a shame Kamal stopped taking fighting seriously after his loss to Aoki. He had a lot of potential.Ok u are right and i am wrong
Kamel should be considered witu the other last 11 fights
He was fucking ragdolling him, controlling him.I don't think taking someone down 21 times in 3 rounds is impressive. That means they got back up everytime you took them down. I'd be more impressed with taking someone down 3 times and not letting them up. He dominated the fight, no doubt, but letting someone up that many times is not impressive at all. Trujillo must have been exhausted from getting up that many times.
And he just finished 2 of the top 3.No, since joining the UFC he has a 50% finish rate. And of his last 6 opponents he finished 4. His finish rate is actually increasing.
Shalorus may not be meaningful to you but he finished 4 th in the Olympic trials in wrestling, so it impressed me.kamal shalorus isnt consider meaningful imo
tibau on the other hand has many meaningful wins
rda, stephens
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamal_Shalorus
3 loses out of 3 matches in the ufc
Shalorus may not be meaningful to you but he finished 4 th in the Olympic trials in wrestling, so it impressed me.
Khabib wins both.My opinion is that winning the judges is far less meaningful than winning the opponent