Kettlebells or Weights?

Ares.420

Purple Belt
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
1,792
Reaction score
0
Whats better? Kettlebells have a huge array of benefits from conditioning to posture to core strength, where as weights have a more isolating way of developing strength and have the aesthetic aspect to it.

What do people prefer?
 
First - both are weights. Second, if your goal is develop strength, then a barbell is better. Third, most everything that you can do with a kettlebell, you can do with dumbells. If you have access to kbs at a gym, then feel free to use them. Otherwise, they are not really worth the money.
 
Both are useful. Cost to benefit analysis, barbells and plates with a pair of loadable dumbell handles are light years ahead of kettlebells in usefulness. Most kettlebell hype is bullshit perpetuated by people trying to make money of them and their insane pricing.
 
I use my garage as a pretty decent home gym with heavy bags, speed bags, skip ropes, stationary bike and I have a 12kg and 16kg kb which I use for conditioning, go as far as I can before I can't do anything more and have to stop, I have a weight bench and preacher bench I was advise to build myself with weights and use the kbs to burn fat and for cardio.. I'll post some photo's of my gym, so everyone can see for themselves.
 
Yeah, the bells are expensive, you heard of that Paval guy, he's like the kettlebell man.. so are weights are better choice for strength training?
 
Yeah, the bells are expensive, you heard of that Paval guy, he's like the kettlebell man.. so are weights are better choice for strength training?

Everyone has heard of Pavel. Barbells are better.
 
Kettlebells are fixed in weight, barbells are loadable. It allows for a gradual progressive overload. Someone who squat regularly with a barbell will develop way more leg strength than anyone could ever have by using only kettlebells. I think bells are more useful for conditioning exercises and assistance work like core stuff.
 
Kettlebells are fixed in weight, barbells are loadable. It allows for a gradual progressive overload. Someone who squat regularly with a barbell will develop way more leg strength than anyone could ever have by using only kettlebells. I think bells are more useful for conditioning exercises and assistance work like core stuff.

Agreed.
 
Cheers for the advice guys, learn something a day eh
 
Kettlebells are good for kettlebell comp style lifting. Anything else can be done just as effectively with a dumbell.
 
First - both are weights. Second, if your goal is develop strength, then a barbell is better. Third, most everything that you can do with a kettlebell, you can do with dumbells. If you have access to kbs at a gym, then feel free to use them. Otherwise, they are not really worth the money.

The one lift that I really like with a kettlebell that you can't do with a dumbbell is the belly-up overhead press. It's just like an overhead press, but the weight held above the handle instead of against your arm like it would be in a regular kettlebell press.

That being said... if you have a choice between kettlebells or "weights" (plates?) then go with the plates. Their modularity makes them way more versatile than kettlebells.
 
Instead of paying for kettlebells, can I just fill up my old water kettle with concrete? :)
 
I just wrote a huge response to this. Then I shortened it.

1) Kettlebells are different than dumbbells. Many things can be done with both, some things aren't as effective with a dumbbell, however, and that's the truth. There is marketing hype, yes. There is also difference. I would MUCH prefer to swing a heavy kettlebell between my legs than a big wide dumbbell, for obvious reasons.
2) You will never be able to load your legs for strength with kettlebells like you will with a barbell. Ever. Tons of guys (maybe one or two girls) here squat over 300lbs. I challenge you to find a 300lb kettlebell, and then I challenge you to afford it, and then I challenge you to figure out how to squat with it.
3) Gradual loading with KBs is a function of your wallet. With a barbell it's easy to afford a couple 2.5 or 5lb plates in addition to your 10s, 25s, and 45s. With KBs you will be making the jump to the next weighted bell by first increasing the number of reps you can do with the lower. As you can imagine, this makes it all but impossible to stay with a strict 3RM building plan, for instance.
4) What are you aiming for? Barbell > KB for focused strength work and load. All day. However, consider your resources. If I had enough cash to buy a bench for preacher curls, I would have stacked up my gym with kettlebells first for their conditioning, shoulder building/stability, and core benefits.

It's all about what you want. This forum is largely focused on the pursuit of more strength or more power. There's a reason those goals are represented largely by powerlifting or olympic lifting competition. However, many guys here are amateur or pro martial artists, fighters, health nuts, strongmen, athletes, rugby players (holla,) current or ex-military, hardened street criminals, etc... and could benefit greatly from kettlebell work.
 
Wow, everyone is in a good mood. I expected much flaming when I opened the thread.
 
I did the "Kettlebell Challenge" at the Arnold, which was clean and press a 132lb KB. Warm-up sets were easy. Got to the big'un but couldn't keep it racked at my shoulder, or I'da had the press, too.

KBs are a good tool, but a basic 300lb Oly-sized set will get you much further.
 
The one lift that I really like with a kettlebell that you can't do with a dumbbell is the belly-up overhead press. It's just like an overhead press, but the weight held above the handle instead of against your arm like it would be in a regular kettlebell press.

That being said... if you have a choice between kettlebells or "weights" (plates?) then go with the plates. Their modularity makes them way more versatile than kettlebells.

Hold a DB by the end, not the handle, overhead. Almost the exact same effect and difficulty. Sometimes harder.


@745 - I agree. I expected to smell burning. Even B0rt was nice.
 
I did the "Kettlebell Challenge" at the Arnold, which was clean and press a 132lb KB. Warm-up sets were easy. Got to the big'un but couldn't keep it racked at my shoulder, or I'da had the press, too.

KBs are a good tool, but a basic 300lb Oly-sized set will get you much further.

Were you allowed to snatch it, if you could?
 
Were you allowed to snatch it, if you could?

Umm. I didn't ask. The guy that tried before me was doing C&P. Surprisingly, he could clean it but not press it.

I've not done much snatching, so I dunno if I coulda snatched it... Next year.
 
Back
Top