- Joined
- May 10, 2010
- Messages
- 42,421
- Reaction score
- 4,906
Who's the more well rounded fighter between Kebab and Colon?
If you judge who's actually more effective with the weaker parts of their game, Kebab's striking or Colon's ground game? It's undoubtedly Kebab who is more effective with the weakest skill set. While he'll never be a K-1 striker, he was popping that job out and mixing up his strikes pretty well I'd say.
While Colon... All of his losses come from subs, one of them from a 125'r. He shows absolutely no threats from the top or bottom, and has even looked to the ref for a stand up.
Colonic fan boys can talk all they want about Kebab's rudimentary striking, but at least he's effective with it and can actually do some damage, unlike Colon who looks pretty much helpless on the ground.
If you judge who's actually more effective with the weaker parts of their game, Kebab's striking or Colon's ground game? It's undoubtedly Kebab who is more effective with the weakest skill set. While he'll never be a K-1 striker, he was popping that job out and mixing up his strikes pretty well I'd say.
While Colon... All of his losses come from subs, one of them from a 125'r. He shows absolutely no threats from the top or bottom, and has even looked to the ref for a stand up.
Colonic fan boys can talk all they want about Kebab's rudimentary striking, but at least he's effective with it and can actually do some damage, unlike Colon who looks pretty much helpless on the ground.