- Joined
- Oct 13, 2006
- Messages
- 29,353
- Reaction score
- 6,997
We don't stand a chance.
It seems like across the board the Democrats are making the most unrealistic promises possible in their quest for the nomination.
I would oppose him if he actually made that move. I don't change my views depending on the messenger.
LOL. And in Japan that is a serious heel move.
The ultimate heel move would be to do that with a bazooka, and doing so after the conclusion of the match. Pull it out of yourself like an ACME production, and nobody, not even the announcers address it.
I will just say, Trump bots were warned on this, when Trump bi-passed wall funding by executive order.
You opened Pandora's box.
haha, Wil E. Coyote Super Genius.
It’s important to keep in mind Trumps actions don’t justify doing the same thing. The courts are reviewing what he did and I would expect intervene. The Democratic Party is going to look pretty awful if they run completely on Trump is ruining the country by trampling on institutions only to get in office and do the same in turn. You either think what Trump did is wrong and shouldn’t do it or you think it was okay and others can do it.
I would hope so, yes.Well, once the Supreme Court does it's job, we won't have anything to worry about here then.
Instead of you looking for a new job we should start a business.
When was the last time congress declared war? There is a reason why there are so many Trump and Obama fanboys out there. Because they are looking for a king and father figure, and have no fucking clue what our government is about in the first place. This is how people like you criticize one politician as if the problem originated with them. In reality you’re just trying to steer people to what you want.If elected President she'll apparently be two of our three branches of government.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-vows-impose-gun-021502985.html
Don't know where the authority to legislate an exchange of personal property is found in the Constitution.
Not sure what this is. If you're dating someone with a DV conviction you're denied your rights?
SCOTUS already made it clear you can't ban commonly held weapons. Oh wait...
Good thing she's being enabled by Trump getting the ATF to change the legally legislated definition of machinegun and the courts are backing that up.
A better question is, "How in the world were these things ever allowed to be sold?:
Yeah, there are a lot of people on here that are just like that - the OP, however, is generally not.This is how people like you criticize one politician as if the problem originated with them. In reality you’re just trying to steer people to what you want.
If elected President she'll apparently be two of our three branches of government.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-vows-impose-gun-021502985.html
Don't know where the authority to legislate an exchange of personal property is found in the Constitution.
Not sure what this is. If you're dating someone with a DV conviction you're denied your rights?
SCOTUS already made it clear you can't ban commonly held weapons. Oh wait...
Good thing she's being enabled by Trump getting the ATF to change the legally legislated definition of machinegun and the courts are backing that up.
Because they're shotguns? And anyone that's ever used one can tell you they are hilariously impractical. They're more a home defense weapon (and not one I would ever recommend) than anything else. It's a niche firearm for people that want it mostly for the novelty of owning one, much like a Ranch Hand rifle or any number of surplus pistols.
I would oppose him if he actually made that move. I don't change my views depending on the messenger.