Opinion Kamala Harris may win the debate, but she will lose the presidency.

She can absolutely be portrayed as any race. She can be portrayed as being from anywhere in the world, too.

It is literature, and adaptations and interpretations can change any variables whatsoever.

You can set a period drama in the modern day, and they frequently do. You can set a period drama in any city in any country in the world, and they frequently do. You can have any actor play any role at all. Because it is an interpretation of a work of fiction, ya putz.

Plus it’s 2024, she can be anything that she wants.
 
See unlike @Rob Battisti who claims to 'not take either side' but then just ends up agreeing with the right wing posters on everything.

I ACTUALLY don't care about either side. I could give fuck if sherdog democrats don't like what I'm saying. @kflo is genuinely baffled that I'm happy that neither 'side' likes me. He's a middle aged man who still believes in treehouse gang politics, he needs reinforcement of other strangers on the internet to feel strong in his positions.

I'll rip on nazi jake shields apologists like @OneOfOne and @Killer Kadoogan
But I'll also shit on 40 IQ mouth breathers like @Siver! who doesn't think Hermoinie Granger is white.

No man is an island? Fuck that, I'm an Island. I'll say it with my whole chest until you have to run for the hills like @nhbbear does. Kamala is going to LOSE. And not one of you has had the sack to sig bet me on that.

:meow:
Do you use a journal or a spreadsheet?

And I didn’t say neither side likes you. I said “literally no one on either side likes you”.

But I know you simply crave any attention and since no one gives you positive attention you’ll take the negative. Lol.
 
How come we don’t have a play-by-play thread like in the MMA subform?

Smh at winning or losing. Expecting a tired, boring shitshow of partisan hackery and name calling.
 
How come we don’t have a play-by-play thread like in the MMA subform?

Smh at winning or losing. Expecting a tired, boring shitshow of partisan hackers and name calling.

TS didn't have enough balls to make this in the OT and mention those he has beef with. What a can.
 
A lot depends on their debate performances but after tonight she has way more money to burn than Trump.

If he's not a clear winner tonight that seems like the more vulnerable position.

Need to see where the trajectory picks up and stays for at least a month, but even if Trump loses, he's historically always over performed models predictions. Harris needs to get it to the mid 60's
 
Sure, if you agree to delete your account if he does.

We have a deal?
Again why would I bet something that's 50/50? You're the one who is outright saying Trump will win. Put up your account, Nancy
 
Do you even understand the point of a bet you pussy?

Yeah, you find odds that you find meet or exceeded your edge value and then bet. IE, if you think a candiate chances are in the 70% range when bet lines are currently 50/50.
 
Need to see where the trajectory picks up and stays for at least a month, but even if Trump loses, he's historically always over performed models predictions. Harris needs to get it to the mid 60's
Polls always reflect what the channel/source wants them to say.

And Harris getting to the mid 60's, please get real,

her IQ has no chance of being that high.
 
Back
Top