Elections Kamala Harris In Serious Talks For JRE Apperance - First Interview W/ Fox Wednesday

If it alienates her base any more it certainly could be.

I think the extent of the disastrous poling is that she still doesn't have PA secured. PA is the whole election and ultimately it's a center right population.

2 or 3 weeks ago she might have had a path without it. NC was in play for a moment. Then everyone's house washed away and now they may not feel like they're a lot better off than they were 4 years ago. Now, I don't think governance or policy has any bearing on that, but people vote for change when they're suffering.

I'm still slightly favoring her to win, I think she will take PA, NV and the northern states but it doesn't look as rosy as it did 3 weeks ago.

NV is probably the most likely out of the swing states to go to Harris but also the least important one. There's barely any scenarios where it'd matter who ends up winning NV.

I also feel like the northern states are somewhat connected. I don't really see a scenario where she'd win MI and WI but lose PA.
 
She announced plans to legalize weed right? Huge fuck up on her part. Should have saved that for the Rogan show and had the Elon/joint moment to let that cat out of the bag.
Did she? I missed that headline
 
depending which Kamala will turn up on JRE, if the politician version turn up she'll bomb it for sure. We haven't seen the other normal, being herself version which may help her looks relatable to voters
 
Ill respect that opinion if its yours. Its not mine. I think Tulsi's sharp AF.

But one thing you can't deny is that Kamala shouldn't even be here after Tulsi throttled her on national tv.
Even before Tulsi went MAGA, it always seemed clear to me that she lacked the intelligence or ethics to get to the top. And no, Harris is a good candidate. She was a bad fit for the 2016 environment, but she was considered an elite prospect before that. Kind of like Gary Sheffield (top prospect, looks like a bust, gets a change of environment and becomes a star).
 
It would be a huge slap in the face to his core audience for Rogan to do an interview with Kamala and not Trump.
 
Even before Tulsi went MAGA, it always seemed clear to me that she lacked the intelligence or ethics to get to the top. And no, Harris is a good candidate. She was a bad fit for the 2016 environment, but she was considered an elite prospect before that. Kind of like Gary Sheffield (top prospect, looks like a bust, gets a change of environment and becomes a star).
Pretty much disagree with everything you said especially the bit about Kamala being elite. Holy shit
 
I'd love it but no way she's going on Rogan. This is something ridiculously un presidential. As much as I'd love to see it.
I'm with you and don't get it, but it's a new era. We might be too old to understand. I don't know. It all feels weird to me.
 
Pretty much disagree with everything you said especially the bit about Kamala being elite. Holy shit
Saying Tulsi lacks intelligence when she's 10 times more clever than Harris is pretty funny. She's incredibly bright, but has proven she has no moral principles.

Trying to spin Harris as an elite prospect is just plain retarded. You have to be a total dishonest hack to say that.
 
Rogan: if you’re an American and concerned about the economy, what are your plans on getting this country back on track

Kamala: I grew up in a middle class family
 
Lmao so true. Meanwhile Trump is canceling all these interviews and somehow the narrative is the same with them. It’s a cult
Rogan doesn’t really go hard on anyone and lets them speak. Im all for Kamala hanging herself
 
when people can't afford rent and groceries and we're inching closer to WW3 and have a 3rd world invasion along the border, and her only answer is "I was raised in a middle class family" and droning on about "ambitions and aspirations and dreams", she's already toast.

I think Rent and Groceries are a real concern.

Job numbers are great, American manufacturing is surging, salaries are up, and the DJIA is looking awesome. In any other time those things would make this election a layup, but that's all tier 2 of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. It means nothing if the tier 1 need for Food and Shelter aren't being met.

I personally prefer her plans to tackle those food and rent issues, but justified or not she's seen as the "incumbent" and he's the change candidate. If people want change she's in trouble.
 
Back
Top