Yeah, I definitely think it's just how she found happiness and what was right for her situation, and can also be right for a lot of women who see it as some kind of act of aggression or violation to accept leadership from a man when it possibly makes the most sense for the men to be in that position.
But it should be a balance of leadship roles, switching and rotating to whoever makes the sense in that moment. It shouldn't automatically fall on the man, because it should go by the logic what is the most efficient. Not by what is betweem your legs. When it's an area of strength or expertise of the woman, then the woman should have a leadership role and if it's something the man is the better at, then the man should be in the leadership role. Simple as. Obviously then you have certain areas men in general are better at, and others women are better at. But you still have to go by an individual basis. And the woman can, for example, be better at math, than the man, which is generally more a strength of men. But in that case, the man must be able to still accept the woman is the most suitable to be the leader when it comes to numbers and other math related subject. These things happen.
