Jullian Assange Even More Isolated

Is Julian Assange a Piece of Shit?


  • Total voters
    59

HomerThompson

Banned
Banned
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
41,443
Reaction score
0
Ecuador has cut Julian Assange's internet connection at its embassy in London, preventing him from communicating with the outside world.

The move is to prevent the WikiLeaks founder from interfering in other countries' affairs, Ecuador said.

It comes after Mr Assange questioned accusations that Moscow was responsible for the poisoning of a Russian ex-spy and his daughter in the UK on 4 March.

Mr Assange was granted political asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in 2012.

He was initially staying in London to avoid extradition to Sweden to face questioning over allegations of sex crimes, which the 46-year-old has always denied.

The Swedish authorities have since dropped their investigation, but Mr Assange believes he will be extradited to the US for questioning over the activities of WikiLeaks if he leaves the building.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43573694

Good news. He really turned out to be a piece of shit in the end. Too bad. The more information, the better, but he decided to favor some information over other information in a way I find unacceptable. His involvment with the Seth Rich Conspiracy was the last straw for me.

@Fawlty
 
th
 
I was all about Assange until he turned into a Russian asset.
 
As somebody who hated wikileaks from the beginning this pleases me
 
if a whistleblower does not say what you like then he is piece of ´shit´and ´has´be a foreign spy of other country you dont like.


human thinking. is normal
 
Has anything Wikileaks released actually been wrong? I don't follow them to know.
 
Last edited:
Julian Assange is absolute hero. Because of him and Seth Rich we were able to avoid a major catastrophe in Hillary Clinton.

Interesting that all the Hillary supporters hate him. Hmm...
 
Julian Assange is absolute hero. Because of him and Seth Rich we were able to avoid a major catastrophe in Hillary Clinton.

Interesting that all the Hillary supporters hate him. Hmm...

Did he ever actually release proof that Seth Rich was the source?
 
Has anything Wikileaks released actually been wrong? I don't follow the them to know.

Off the top of my head, the subject lines of some of the DNC emails were altered in minor ways.

But then there was other weird stuff, like when they... held a press conference?... to release info about Hillary or Seth Rich and then... either flogged a book, asked for donations or both.

And the time they emailed Trump Jr to collude on wiki releases so that wikileaks could recover some of it's impartial reputation after being exposed as a Russian asset.
 
Off the top of my head, the subject lines of some of the DNC emails were altered in minor ways.

But then there was other weird stuff, like when they... held a press conference?... to release info about Hillary or Seth Rich and then... either flogged a book, asked for donations or both.

And the time they emailed Trump Jr to collude on wiki releases so that wikileaks could recover some of it's impartial reputation after being exposed as a Russian asset.

Sounds shady as fuck, makes sense as to why they took the risk to release everything they did. I did appreciate a lot of the stuff they released though, even if their reasoning wasn't transparency.
 
Last edited:
Off the top of my head, the subject lines of some of the DNC emails were altered in minor ways.

Source?

But then there was other weird stuff, like when they... held a press conference?... to release info about Hillary or Seth Rich and then... either flogged a book, asked for donations or both.

Oh my God Becky...thats like...so weird. Anyone who tries to sell a book is a total fraud.

And the time they emailed Trump Jr to collude on wiki releases so that wikileaks could recover some of it's impartial reputation after being exposed as a Russian asset.

Wikileaks was clearly going after Hillary Clinton. Not because they are "Russian assets"(seriously come back to realitywith that nonsense) but because she is one of the most powerful and corrupt people on the planet. And that's what wikileaks does...they expose corruption. And God bless them for that.
 
if a whistleblower does not say what you like then he is piece of ´shit´and ´has´be a foreign spy of other country you dont like.


human thinking. is normal
No, my analysis of all the available facts has lead me to this conclusion, dummy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,254,468
Messages
56,648,845
Members
175,333
Latest member
dubhlinn
Back
Top