1. The official Sherdog Store is back! Check it out! » Discuss it here! »

Judges discussing decisions with one another?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Da Speeit, Aug 18, 2015.

  1. Da Speeit Plutonium Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    87,309
    Likes Received:
    5,041
    Location:
    In bed with your bitch, watching game of thrones,
    Would you be for it?
    Instead of judges sitting separately, why not have them at a single table with one monitor where they can discuss the round with one another and be forced to a conclusion on who won the round? Treat each round as if it were a fight; if Judge 1 and 2 believe fighter A won, the majority ruling would give him that round, as opposed to each tallying their own scorecard and adding it at the end; it would be a single scorecard agreed upon by 3 judges.

    What say you?
     
  2. kammfreudenstei Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,955
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    That would definitely be a different dynamic, if they could do it in timely fashion. I feel like they would announce /display who won the round to the crowd
     
  3. Metallicalabran Don't be scared homie!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    3,469
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Temuco, Chile
    that way the judge with better dialectic skills chose always the winner ? WTF

    the most separated judges the better, and the most far away they are from each other the better.

    Perfect scenario ??? 10 judges (the more, the better), from 10 different countries at kilometers of distance.

    WORST POSSIBLE SCENARIO ? YOUR IDEA.
     
  4. Great Angus Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2015
    Messages:
    742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    North Kilttown
    I'm not sure. If you had a really good debater he could sway the other two judges into thinking how he does. What we need is consistent judging and accountability for egregious decisions
     
  5. KhabibTheBeagle Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2014
    Messages:
    12,306
    Likes Received:
    6
    No way. Each judge needs to present their own individual score. They don't always get it right, but at least there was no chance of a biased judge swaying the opinions of the other two.
     
  6. Chramelated The Real Guy, The Best Guy Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    13,831
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Bull City
    I'd prefer if Sherdoggers could judge the fights instead.
     
  7. Da Speeit Plutonium Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    87,309
    Likes Received:
    5,041
    Location:
    In bed with your bitch, watching game of thrones,
    so you guys are discouraged by the possibility that a judge who possibly knows more than the other two could convince the other two of a correct decision?
     
  8. dropshot001 Red Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    0
    This would become a contest of who is the most convincing
     
  9. trblesome1 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,754
    Likes Received:
    5
    There will never be a perfect way of judging, the more people you involve in the decision the more chance for bias or people who aren't good at judging

    Going by stats alone would also be ridiculous because not every strike/takedown/grappling advance has the same impact on the fight

    It seems like they could make sure the people who are doing it would be held accountable more than they are and at least that would make the ridiculous decisions less likely
     
  10. Chules @UVEE'S BESTIE

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    153,720
    Likes Received:
    7,940
    Location:
    ENGERLAND
    This.

    The 'Who do you think won' poll threads mostly always bring out the fighter who should've won
     
  11. Da Speeit Plutonium Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    87,309
    Likes Received:
    5,041
    Location:
    In bed with your bitch, watching game of thrones,
    I agree, and stoppages should all be twitter polls. Refs should be equipped with smartphones.

    Shogun would bead.
     
  12. trblesome1 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,754
    Likes Received:
    5
    Yeah sure nobody votes for the guy they like more in those polls lol
     
  13. Bilal Bones Blue Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2013
    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    0
    Diaz bros, Shogun, Fedor and some other fighters would never lose a decision then. Any Jon Jones fight that goes to a decision would be lost by him.
     
  14. Chramelated The Real Guy, The Best Guy Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    13,831
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Bull City
    Are you having a fucking giggle at my suggestion?
     
  15. MMA Silver Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,608
    Likes Received:
    52
    I don't see how it would improve anything. You don't event make an attempt to explain what it would improve about judging and more importantly how it would improve it.
     
  16. Da Speeit Plutonium Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    87,309
    Likes Received:
    5,041
    Location:
    In bed with your bitch, watching game of thrones,
    Well, because i want to discuss it, which is why i opened a discussion instead of saying "I AM RIGHT HEAR ME OUT"

    What a strangely defensive post.
     
  17. accolyte1022 Duty Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    28,046
    Likes Received:
    5,402
    Location:
    Rostok
    Undefeated BJ Penn and Shogun!
     
  18. BROKENSPROKET just lurkin

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,185
    Likes Received:
    0
    I got a better idea. Kenny Rice and Baas Rutten touched on it.

    Every judge should be in a separate sound proof room. Each get 6 monitors to watch the fight from all angles. The also get audio feed from microphones in the ring, no commentators and crowd noise reduced. They score the fight based on what they see, independent of what other judges are doing.
     
  19. Metallicalabran Don't be scared homie!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    3,469
    Likes Received:
    104
    Location:
    Temuco, Chile
    nope, we are discouraged by the possibility that a judge who possibly knows LESS than the other two could convince the other two of an INCORRECT decision.

    Why do you think a judge who knows more of fighting is the better convincing judgest too?

    THE MOST JUDGES

    THE MORE UNRELATED

    THE BEST
     
  20. LiLoMMA Lindsay Lohan's party belt

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2015
    Messages:
    5,449
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    It's sad, but I don't think MMA will ever get this right. The phrase "don't leave it in the hands if the judges" is telling, this is not going to get fixed
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.