Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by ROAR**, Sep 22, 2013.
Hmm...interesting. The next Adeleide Bird?
Looks like Chris Lee is trying to do his best CJ Ross impression.
While he may be off point-wise, at least he had the right fighter winning both fights. I gave Jones/Gus to Jones, though I could see it both ways, but I had Woodley beating Shields in that god-awful slopfest they called a match.
Its not that hard to see why the fight would be given 49-46 when you re watch the fight
Apart from Gus taking the 1st and Jones the 5th. You could make a point for either in the other 3 rounds. Gustaffson didnt win any of them CLEARLY. Its not the disgraceful Judging some are making out
I see a strong argument for Gus having 4 over Jones having 4.... unless you subscribe to Forrest-Griffining the belt. Then its 3-2 Gus.
1: Gus via more strikes (because his takedown goes nowhere)
2: Gus via more sig strikes and aggression (fightmet counted Jones blocked and leg)
3: Very close, could easily go both ways
4: Jones won it. Thought it was more Gus but I was wrong.
5: Gus via more strikes (because Jones' takedown goes nowhere)
Chris Lee can tell it to Sweden.
This doesn't surprise me one bit lol
Not the slightest bit surprised either. Dude's an amateur, as are the vast majority of the State Athletic Commissions judges.
I had jj winning by one round, very, very close though.
I had jones winning rounds 2-5. I know it isnt a popular score card, but I thought he did more damage and pushed the pace.
this shit has got to stop......
Serious question, just trying to understand: In what capacity was Jone's striking in two, three, and five more damaging than Gus?
No way it was 49-46
Separate names with a comma.