Jorge Masvidal confirmed Trump Supporter

[HereticBD]

In case you couldn't already tell, Liberals make up their own history.

 

[robotsonic]

It seems like a goofy thing to worry about whether or not your president is abusing drugs?

Yes - we do know his medical history. One of his previous doctors publicly said that it was well known Trump was abusing speed for many years. Then we also have his constant manic and depressed cycles. He'll give one speech and be rambling incoherently, bounding with energy, unable to speak in full sentences and jumping from topic to topic. Then we have depressed, 4th of July speech/UN speech trump, where he slurs his words, his speech rate comes to a grinding halt and he struggles to stay awake.

So we have photographic evidence of him with illegal drugs from another country
We have direct testimony of a personal physician of Trump's
And we have video evidence of Trump displaying the symptoms of being on speed, and crashing.

And btw, it's a completely valid concern to have to worry about whether or not the guy commanding the most powerful nuclear arsenal in the world is on drugs.

Fucking LOL, only someone suffering from the most virulent case of TDS could see some cold medicine in a drawer and come to the conclusion that the dude was a speed freak. You people have gone fucking crazy, how can you not see it??? I don't even like Trump but this is such an insane reach you have to see that you're the one who comes across as nuts on this one?

 

[Deleted member 579584]

It seems like a goofy thing to worry about whether or not your president is abusing drugs?

Yes - we do know his medical history. One of his previous doctors publicly said that it was well known Trump was abusing speed for many years. Then we also have his constant manic and depressed cycles. He'll give one speech and be rambling incoherently, bounding with energy, unable to speak in full sentences and jumping from topic to topic. Then we have depressed, 4th of July speech/UN speech trump, where he slurs his words, his speech rate comes to a grinding halt and he struggles to stay awake.

So we have photographic evidence of him with illegal drugs from another country
We have direct testimony of a personal physician

It seems like a goofy thing to worry about whether or not your president is abusing drugs?

Yes - we do know his medical history. One of his previous doctors publicly said that it was well known Trump was abusing speed for many years. Then we also have his constant manic and depressed cycles. He'll give one speech and be rambling incoherently, bounding with energy, unable to speak in full sentences and jumping from topic to topic. Then we have depressed, 4th of July speech/UN speech trump, where he slurs his words, his speech rate comes to a grinding halt and he struggles to stay awake.

So we have photographic evidence of him with illegal drugs from another country
We have direct testimony of a personal physician of Trump's
And we have video evidence of Trump displaying the symptoms of being on speed, and crashing.

And btw, it's a completely valid concern to have to worry about whether or not the guy commanding the most powerful nuclear arsenal in the world is on drugs.

of Trump's
And we have video evidence of Trump displaying the symptoms of being on speed, and crashing.

And btw, it's a completely valid concern to have to worry about whether or not the guy commanding the most powerful nuclear arsenal in the world is on drugs.

I have not seen his July 4 speech. To be honest most of his speeches bore me. Can you link me where the doctor says he abuses speed and has depressed episodes. I do believe you sir I would just like to read it. If he is addict to cold meds I hopw we will do d out if is taking it. Do you agree with me thier cornpop? That is a serious thing to take. Taking speed is horrible too. I use to take speed when I worked 15 hour days and it would Fuck me up badly. So yes I agree with you by taking those meds.

 

[ScholarDayo]

He will suffer the same fate as the last Trump supporter

 

[Corn Pop Hombre]

Fucking LOL, only someone suffering from the most virulent case of TDS could see some cold medicine in a drawer and come to the conclusion that the dude was a speed freak. You people have gone fucking crazy, how can you not see it??? I don't even like Trump but this is such an insane reach you have to see that you're the one who comes across as nuts on this one?

Yes I too have boxes of meth precursor from the UK sitting around in drawers in my office. That is a totally normal thing that most people do.

 

[robotsonic]

Yes I too have boxes of meth precursor from the UK sitting around in drawers in my office. That is a totally normal thing that most people do.

What you're doing is akin to saying that as he had a pen on his desk, he's a pedophile as some pedophiles also use pens. It's such a silly reach that you're either trolling or just very, very stupid.

 

[Corn Pop Hombre]

What you're doing is akin to saying that as he had a pen on his desk, he's a pedophile as some pedophiles also use pens. It's such a silly reach that you're either trolling or just very, very stupid.

Uh? What? What an obviously wrong analogy.

No - seeing someone with overseas meth precursor in their drawer and calling them a drug abuser is not akin to saying all people with pens are pedophiles.

It is akin to seeing a loli poster on someone's wall and then suspecting they may be pedophiles.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

no really surprised. he's Cuban, probably understands the true meaning of "oppression" and has worked hard for everything in his life. no doubt why he's conservative and abhors leftist policies.

 

[robotsonic]

Uh? What? What an obviously wrong analogy.

No - seeing someone with overseas meth precursor in their drawer and calling them a drug abuser is not akin to saying all people with pens are pedophiles.

It is akin to seeing a loli poster on someone's wall and then suspecting they may be pedophiles.

OK so you're an idiot then.

EDIT - I also have 'meth precursor' in my office drawer as well if that's what we're now calling cough medicine.

 

[PHATV]

Yes I too have boxes of meth precursor from the UK sitting around in drawers in my office. That is a totally normal thing that most people do.

So you think Trump is making meth for personal use from three boxes of Sudafed in a pic? Is that what I'm hearing?

 

[Corn Pop Hombre]

So you think Trump is making meth for personal use from three boxes of Sudafed in a pic? Is that what I'm hearing?

No. Because you don't need to turn it into meth to have a narcotic effect.

 

[cade187]

Clinton won by 3 million votes, but the electoral college handed Trump the victory. Hopefully this year will be different after the recent Supreme Court decision.

The popular vote is irrelevant. I feel like you don’t understand your political system.

 

[Rational Poster]

Wowzers, you guys will defend any loony accusation as long as it's directed at the President.

That medicine is illegal in the states..

 

[Utahraptor Ostrommaysi]

The popular vote is irrelevant. I feel like you don’t understand your political system.

I know, but thanks to the Supreme Court states can force the electoral college to vote for whoever won the popular vote. So it might not be so irrelevant anymore.

 

[MilesAbove]

TS is super slow.

Nobody ever confused Mas for a smart man. Just a principled man.

 

[PHATV]

Clinton won by 3 million votes, but the electoral college handed Trump the victory. Hopefully this year will be different after the recent Supreme Court decision.

What do you think the decision was and how would it be "different"?
They confirmed (unanimously) the electoral college members must cast their ballot for whoever the people vote for and are not free to become "faithless electors". Based on popular vote BY STATE. As it's always been. They have to vote based on the popular vote of their state, as it currently happens and did in 2016---save a handful who did not vote for Trump---but were required to based on their ruling.

Click here to read the full article.

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld state laws requiring Electoral College representatives to support their state’s popular winner in presidential elections.

The unanimous decision comes after “faithless electors” in Washington and Colorado voted contrary to who they originally promised to support.

“State election laws evolved to reinforce that development, ensuring that a State’s electors would vote the same way as its citizens,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court. “States listed only presidential candidates on the ballot, on the understanding that electors would do no more than vote for the winner.”

Kagan continued the court’s opinion by saying “electors are not free agents. They are to vote for the candidate whom the State’s voters have chosen.”

The decision could impact the upcoming presidential election as members of the Electoral College must comply with the popular vote.

A handful of Democratic electors attempted to deny Donald Trump’s presidency in 2016. Three members in Washington state voted for former Secretary of State Colin Powell, rather than the former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, with hopes that colleagues would join them.

The efforts didn’t succeed and each elector was fined $1,000, prompting legal arguments about the constitutionality of restricting Electoral College votes.

In Colorado, an elector voted for former governor of Ohio John Kasich instead of Clinton. But, rather than receiving a fine, the elector was removed and replaced from office. After being removed from office, he filed suit and won in an appeals court since the state doesn’t possess the power to remove electors from office.

“The Constitution’s text and the nation’s history both support allowing a State to enforce an elector’s pledge to support his party’s nominee - and the state voters’ choice - for President,” Kagan wrote.

 

[PHATV]

I know, but thanks to the Supreme Court states can force the electoral college to vote for whoever won the popular vote. So it might not be so irrelevant anymore.

 

[cade187]

I know, but thanks to the Supreme Court states can force the electoral college to vote for whoever won the popular vote. So it might not be so irrelevant anymore.

The electoral college is stupid, but popular vote also isn’t a good way to determine who should be president. The popular vote gives too much voting power to large urban centres. Number of seats is the best way to balance power, but people don’t like that system either (Canada).

 

[HereticBD]

I know, but thanks to the Supreme Court states can force the electoral college to vote for whoever won the popular vote. So it might not be so irrelevant anymore.

Faithless electors were never much of an issue. Eliminating them, was just a formality. It really has nothing to do with the popular vote either, as it only applies to the individual states(which is normal). They're not being forced to vote for the candidate who wins the overall popular vote. They just can't overrule their state's outcome anymore, which they never really did. The popular vote is still irrelevant to the outcome.

 

[AngryPorto]

Pipe the fuck down dude

Yo wtf, dawg, learn how to use commas, bro, I'm not a 'pipe the fuck down dude'. "Pipe the fuck down, dude" is what you meant.

Unless of course you meant "pipe The Fuck-down Dude" which would referring to me as The Pipe-down Dude, which IS my porn name, so if you wanna pipe me let me know we can set up a time and I'll go through my rates.