Jones vs Alex a unanimous decision? Really?

Naf L time

White Belt
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
It was a close decision at best , the fact that it was judged a unanimous decision is just a slap in the face to all intelligent mma fans out there. When will you stop supporting a fraudulent product (UFC) ? Money talks so speak with your wallet and boycott this poor excuse of a sport filled with corruption from the top down.

The lack of effort to fix the issue by zuffa is convenient at best and criminal at worst. I won't buy that they have zero leverage over the issue when they have strong armed other orgs into going bankrupt and selling out... Especially when you consider how eerily hands on they are when they have waged propaganda wars/defamation campaigns against fighters and mma reporters.

I refuse to believe that there are sheep out there that are such ignorant consumers that they continue to purchase these ppvs and bet on these corrupt and fraudulent/rigged matches. Stop supporting them!
 
Last edited:
3 intelligent judges that understand how to score fights.

I get that it's a rarity. I just don't get the rest of your post.

"Should have been a split decision at least..."

Bwahahahaha
 
Before we can continue, I want you to tell me what a split decision is.
 
It's not hard to find intelligent judges. It's hard to find judges with integrity. But oh yeah I forgot, those don't get hired to begin with.

Forget the technicality of what split means , everyone who saw that fight knows it should've been a "close" decision, as in NOT A UNANIMOUS DECISION. Semantics.

Why? Are you defending the bad judging ?



HAHAHAHAHA
 
Split D for Gus or a Draw... all the judges are drinking Jones' gatoraide

Dana just said the doctors were going to stop the fight after the 4th round, and Jones begged them not to
 
It was a close decision 48-47 is close. I couldn't see 49-46 for Jon, but the decision was close.

Your logic that it is only close if the judges have different winners is not good logic.
 
So you dont know what a split decision is. If you had been upset about the score that was very in favor of jones i would assume you are a butt hurt fanboy, but getting pissed off about it being unanimous means you are either 12, or you are retarded.
 
It's official , the UFC IS CORRUPT


If you don't know , now you know!


(Still scratching my head about machida vs shogun 1 )
 
It's not hard to find intelligent judges. It's hard to find judges with integrity. But oh yeah I forgot, those don't get hired to begin with.

Forget the technicality of what split means , everyone who saw that fight knows it should've been a "close" decision, as in NOT A UNANIMOUS DECISION. Semantics.

Why? Are you defending the bad judging ?



HAHAHAHAHA
 
lol , if you're rooting for a split decision you obviously don't understand anything about mma .
 
So you dont know what a split decision is. If you had been upset about the score that was very in favor of jones i would assume you are a butt hurt fanboy, but getting pissed off about it being unanimous means you are either 12, or you are retarded.

No idiot , it means that the sport I onced loved now stinks of corruption. Meanwhile you want to turn a blind eye to it and argue semantics.

Pffff

Learn a bit about how the world works , do your homework.
 
You think it should have been a split decision?
In other words, you think at least 1 judge should have got it wrong?
Did 2/3 of you pick 1 winner while 1/3 of you picked a different winner?


or do you not know what a split decision is???
 
facepalm.jpg


Sherdog needs a quiz when you sign up for a new account requiring that you need to know what a split decision means before you're allowed to post.
 
Whatever. I know what I saw , that fight was not a unanimous decision in Jones' favor. Nothing you guys can say will change my mind on that.

Which fighter would you have preferred to have been at the end of the fight ? Exactly.
 
I strongly believe that TS should boycott MMA. and MMA websites. it is the only way that the corruption in the sport can be stopped

and I don't just mean the troll account that TS is using for this particular thread.
 
No idiot , it means that the sport I onced loved now stinks of corruption. Meanwhile you want to turn a blind eye to it and argue semantics.

Pffff

Learn a bit about how the world works , do your homework.

So (assuming your unfounded and ridiculous accusation is true)you think it would be better if only 2 of the 3 judges had been bribed?That is still dumb as fuck.
 
Back
Top