- Joined
- Dec 18, 2018
- Messages
- 951
- Reaction score
- 0
Youre kidding right? Troll maybe?
what did i say thats troll... u trolll
Youre kidding right? Troll maybe?
what did i say thats troll... u trolll
You said Jones was clean for the most recent Gustafssoon fight. JHe literally failed
PED tests BEFORE the fight by USADA and at least one test that we know of AFTER the fight administered by VADA.
You call that clean!?
Joe Rogan said he is clean is joe rogan a troll to? ok He did not fail ANY test... if he did why is jeff novitsky saying the picogram so small it would NOT effect performance and the comparison was like a grain of sand in a OLYMPIC size swimming pool .... the samle was ANALYZED by top scientists in USA just admit ur man destroyed ur hero gustagsson CLEAN
Jones technical ability on the ground is unparrallell
Joe Rogan and Jeff Novitsky are UFC employees dumbass. Regardless of effect on performance the FACT is banned substances were in Jones system during that fight which means he did NOT fight clean. Now kindly see your way out sir.
Listen ........ this last tie i will explain this to u little mind ...... the contamination has resulted into a PULSING effect which can stay in jon system potentionally..............FOREVER ............... so hold on let me get thos straight,..... so u want a fighter SANCTIONED because of a grain of sand in a swimming POOL that has NO ways of exiting jones BODY .... the minimum this could stay is potentially 9 year....... maybe once again FOREVER ....
Go take an English class kid.
I never said anything about sanctions. YOU made the dubious claim that Jon Jones was clean during the Gustaffson fight. That is a categorically and verifiably false assertion. It is a FACT that Jon Jones fought with a banned substance in his body. This FACT was verified by the UFC,USADA,VADA and Jon Jones himself.
He is NOT a clean fighter.
Regardless of the performance benefits he gained or the punishment or lack thereof. He still was not CLEAN by any definition of the word.
Now, i said kindly see your way out SIR!
Class is over.
I wish someone who knows biology or chemistry could explain to me the evidence of UFC and USADA to support their decision that Jones did not take new PEDs since last time he tested positive.
As an ordinary person without a background of biology or chemistry, I, after reading and trying to understand the words of UFC and USADA, tend to summarise their logic as that because there is possibility that Turinabol could hide somewhere in Jones' system for there is study showing that clomiphene could do so and because Jones did not test positive for PEDs other than Turinabol, there is possibility that Jones did not take Turinabol again since last time he tested positive.
Is that their logic in reality?
I understand what you mean.I was in the same boat as you. BUT I asked my brother and his wife (both PhD in molecular biology with zero interest in MMA, my brother is the head of a cancer research project sponsored by the EU with 5 million€). He laughed when he went over the available information.
Like any true scientists he said
"I would need the full lab data and the exact methods to deliver a verdict of course. But with the information provided you would have to be either very naive or stupid to believe this guy is innocent. Trace amounts of a metabolite pulsing over a year is an utterly ridiculous assumption without having a big set of data that supports that hypothesis. It's IMPOSSIBLE."
I know I'm just a shertard that could've made this up and I obviously won't publish any information about my family. But yeah, I trust those two more then I trust USADA, McLaren, Eichner, Novitsky or the resident sherdog USADA apologist dimspace. It reeks of corruption and nobody would be surprised if some files surfaced in 15 years that provide proof of that corruption.
Look! The spelling and grammar police!
then why was Jon Jones able to fight then? if he wasnt clean? u think this all conspiracy huh? u keep sayin he fought with banned substance but fail to say how small ammount with no performnce enhance benefit WHATSOEVER which he already served his time for .... do u know hos small a PICOGRAM is.... ok about as small as YOUR DICK.... ok the man served his time
“Excretion data regarding the m3 metabolite is extremely limited and there is no peer reviewed scientific literature firmly establishing urinary excretion patterns or interindividual variability for the m3 metabolite”.His reduced suspension a year and a half ago came about based on his defense being:
I have no idea how it got there. It’s such a small amount that it doesn’t even make sense as to why I would have taken this.
And now, all this time has passed, he’s still testing positive. The explanation for this is that:
The metabolites for the original (incidentally small) unknowing, unintentional ingestion of this substance is still in his body pulsing it’s way out at the most inconvenient times during the usada tests. There is no evidence of a new ingestion...it’s science. Talk to Novitsky.
Meanwhile, there is no study done showing that these metabolites can hang around for anywhere near this long in a controlled group or individual. They are pretending that they need evidence of a new ingestion in order to prove that it isn’t the same substance pulsing from the original (incidentally small, unknowingly taken, accidental) ingestion. They don’t. The fact that he is still popping for it is proof of this, based on the half life studies done on the metabolite. That’s what their testing guidelines were based on. To assume that Jon Jones body is the control group for a study on the half life of metabolites and that he under no circumstances could re-ingest a substance that he had ‘no idea’ how he ingested in the first place is completely ludicrous.
*it'sIts much more likely YOUR A RETARD