- Joined
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 26,009
- Reaction score
- 513
If that’s true, why was he never #1 on the list?
Don’t know don’t care
If that’s true, why was he never #1 on the list?
Guilty as fuck. Besides him popping for the same shit his nfl bro did in the same year (bros sharing illegal dick pills from the same chick pharmacist?), him having the T levels of a grandpa associated with the 1st DC fight it was obvious cycling. Then throw in his zero moral compass and willingness to use illegal substances that make him feel good.Anderson's sanction make it look really bad for him, showed that they'll consider a negligent positive as a failure when looking at whether he's a multiple time offender. And USADA isn't going to reduce a sanction due to contamination if you can't find a credible source for it, which they couldn't provided to CSAC. Add in the rest of the bullshit that he got called on there, like getting Malki to do his anti-doping education for him... he won't be getting a short ban.
Which sucks, because he's an all time great as a fighter, but he did this all to himself.
They also get money from the us olympic committee, how many olympians have they let off?
They also get money from us cycling which was controlled by lance Armstrongs team boss Thom weisel, how did that work out?
At usada guys like William bock (their chief legal )... Big baseball fan.. How did that work out for Barry bonds?
4+1 year?Anderson's sanction make it look really bad for him, showed that they'll consider a negligent positive as a failure when looking at whether he's a multiple time offender. And USADA isn't going to reduce a sanction due to contamination if you can't find a credible source for it, which they couldn't provided to CSAC. Add in the rest of the bullshit that he got called on there, like getting Malki to do his anti-doping education for him... he won't be getting a short ban.
Which sucks, because he's an all time great as a fighter, but he did this all to himself.
If USADA did that, WADA would just override them. There's also the fact that USADA makes most of its money outside of the UFC, so bribery over a mid-level draw in Jon Jones would hardly be worth it in the first place.maybe an offer of a lucrative appointment in WME could be enough of an inducement to soft pedal the punishment for Jones.
I'd be very surprised if he gets more than 4. they'd have to show that he intentionally tried to mislead them - not just "I didn't do it" when he knew he did, but presenting fake evidence like forged bank records, or an email asking a supplement company to doctor a batch and make the lot numbers line up. They've only nailed one guy (Francisco Rivera) for aggravating circumstances, and he arguably could have been charged criminally for the shit he pulled.4+1 year?
Novitsky isn't a former USADA officer. he worked closely with them to get Armstrong, but the guy worked at the FDA and IRS at the time, not USADA.Good point. But have former USADA officers like Novitzy found jobs in big money sporting leagues/promotions before?
Novitzky is straining credulity by claiming that Jones is probably innocent because he 'couldn't be that stupid'. The UFC has Novitzky and his rolodex of current employees in USADA, maybe an offer of a lucrative appointment in WME could be enough of an inducement to soft pedal the punishment for Jones.
I think this the 2nd time I've said that. I keep thinking that he was from USADA.Novitsky isn't a former USADA officer. he worked closely with them to get Armstrong, but the guy worked at the FDA and IRS at the time, not USADA.
If Jones got anything less than 4 years, that'd open USADA up to litigation from fighters who got harsher punishments.He's getting 2 at the least, 4 at the most. and probably closer to 4.
The only ones who've gotten harsher punishments are Rivera, who got 4 for attempting to bullshit his way out of a clenbuterol positive, and Abreu, who got 4 for a clear second offence when there were two clear, unambiguous positives. Neither of them is going to sue.If Jones got anything less than 4 years, that'd open USADA up to litigation from fighters who got harsher punishments.
And USADA isn't going to reduce a sanction due to contamination if you can't find a credible source for it, which they couldn't provided to CSAC.
This is why he could get more than 4 years. USADA and the arbitration team gave him specific instructions on his last failed test and he didn't abide by them. That's not going to work in his favor and could even be an aggravating factor, which could lead to a longer ban.Add in the rest of the bullshit that he got called on there, like getting Malki to do his anti-doping education for him... he won't be getting a short ban.
Good point. But have former USADA officers like Novitzy found jobs in big money sporting leagues/promotions before?
Novitzky is straining credulity by claiming that Jones is probably innocent because he 'couldn't be that stupid'. The UFC has Novitzky and his rolodex of current employees in USADA, maybe an offer of a lucrative appointment in WME could be enough of an inducement to soft pedal the punishment for Jones.
Litigation encompasses more than just suing someone; Rivera/Abreu could take their case to court and attempt to get their suspension lengths reduced because of the precedent that would be set by USADA should they give Jones less than 4 years.The only ones who've gotten harsher punishments are Rivera, who got 4 for attempting to bullshit his way out of a clenbuterol positive, and Abreu, who got 4 for a clear second offence when there were two clear, unambiguous positives. Neither of them is going to sue.
While I think Jones' lying over the tutorials and supplement control form will prevent any kind of leniency, I'd be surprised if USADA counted them both as aggravating circumstances.This is why he could get more than 4 years. USADA and the arbitration team gave him specific instructions on his last failed test and he didn't abide by them. That's not going to work in his favor and could even be an aggravating factor, which could lead to a longer ban.