Joe Rogan's objectivity

andrikkis7

Rikudō Sennin
@Blue
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Messages
584
Reaction score
308
This guy is truly amazing. In the Rose - Joanna 2 fight, when asked about the significant strikes difference between the two, his response was "yeah but look at Joanna's face".

In the case of Conor - Nate 2 fight, he always barks about how close the fight was but he never once said that Nate's face was like a pizza and Conor's was literally like he walked out of light training.

What the hell Rogan? A little objectivity wouldn't hurt...
 
giphy.gif
 
ill bite... so rogan is wrong to point out the damage on the face of jj. And also wrong for not saying nates face is damaged.
Or
He is not allowed to have an opinion because he is a robot.
 
28033i.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 28033i (1).jpg
    28033i (1).jpg
    127.3 KB · Views: 1
That a commentator should be objective and he is clearly not...and perhaps a little racist as well.

How is he racist? He watched planet of the apes 2 in a predominantly black theater.
 
Don't even get Joe Rogan started on those significant strikes stats, breh
 
Joe is biased

Water is wet

Sky is blue

Women have their secrets.

Who gives a fuck?
 
That a commentator should be objective

Says who?

There are commentators that have reputations of being "homers", I can't remember the last time I heard one getting fired for it.
 
Rogan's just a crazy stoner mma guy with a bit of experience who they happened to allow to scream into a mic 15 or 20 years ago. Never the most professional of ufc employees.He's good but he's not.

Is normal. Is that what the kids still say in the heavies?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top