- Joined
- Jan 15, 2015
- Messages
- 4,650
- Reaction score
- 0
Interdasting
Jack cant see the wood for the trees half the time and his predictions frequently suck.
Jack cant see the wood for the trees half the time and his predictions frequently suck.
If I picked apart a dude in wheelchair, I mean really unleash teh jab and touch him up while mixing in a full repertoire of kicks at varying levels, will Jack Slack breakdown the fight and proclaim me as the fighter w/ the best striking across all weight classes?
No disrespect Jack, but really. I know you are pressured because Conor is hot right now and you have to produce something to read but come on, you are going to honestly and legitimately analyze striking based on a mismatch?
He doesn't make predictions you sped.
He's obviously not basing his opinion of Conor as a striker simply off of this fight. He gave a breakdown of this fight. His opinion of Conor's striking is based off the body of his work. I mean the guy linked a video of a fight that 99% of this board had never seen. I'm sure Jack has seen every fight Conor has had on video multiple times.
My take on it was that he uses the Siever fight to illustrate more than analyze. He's made most (or even all?) of the claims here relating to McGregor's style before.If I picked apart a dude in wheelchair, I mean really unleash teh jab and touch him up while mixing in a full repertoire of kicks at varying levels, will Jack Slack breakdown the fight and proclaim me as the fighter w/ the best striking across all weight classes?
No disrespect Jack, but really. I know you are pressured because Conor is hot right now and you have to produce something to read but come on, you are going to honestly and legitimately analyze striking based on a mismatch?
LOL
If you see Jack slack on an article, its not a selling point its a warning.
Ludicrous stuff
You know Aldo isn't Anderson Silva right?
Can you explain? Using specific examples?
He's obviously not basing his opinion of Conor as a striker simply off of this fight. He gave a breakdown of this fight. His opinion of Conor's striking is based off the body of his work. I mean the guy linked a video of a fight that 99% of this board had never seen. I'm sure Jack has seen every fight Conor has had on video multiple times.
Are you his white knight gay lover coming out to defend him? His articles suck and he often gets it badly wrong frequently pointing out the obvious. And yes he does give predictions of sorts, pointing out why one person is likely to beat the other.
'Sped'. Do you realise how retarded you sound. In future use words commonly understood by people. I'm happy to say i had to google that word.
If I picked apart a dude in wheelchair, I mean really unleash teh jab and touch him up while mixing in a full repertoire of kicks at varying levels, will Jack Slack breakdown the fight and proclaim me as the fighter w/ the best striking across all weight classes?
No disrespect Jack, but really. I know you are pressured because Conor is hot right now and you have to produce something to read but come on, you are going to honestly and legitimately analyze striking based on a mismatch?
I love Jack Slack, but that fight need no analyst from him. Competitive fights like DC-Jon needs an anayisis if it has not already been done so that the reader can learn from it.
Siver being +900 was just a piece falling into place in front of Conor. Outside of the Irish fans, I can feel that most HC fans are starting to rethink his chance of handing a slightly post prime Aldo.
Even if Aldo loses, he will not be like Siver who has the agility of a drunk elephant.
Seriously, Conor v Siver = DC v Henderson.
Yes, the performances were great, but predictable.
Aldo broke his foot by kicking in the Korean Zombie fight because the Korean ZOmbie checked a kick.
Another solid article by Jack Slack.