- Joined
- May 11, 2008
- Messages
- 4,460
- Reaction score
- 0
I think these moves are coming back because all the low-hanging fruit has already been plucked.
That is NICELY said, sir.. Well done
I think these moves are coming back because all the low-hanging fruit has already been plucked.
Who was the Greek who was challenged to arena combat by some renowned soldier, and arrived naked and oiled to out grapple his fully armored opponent?
I think here's where we disagree. Athleticism will determine who makes it to the top, but once there when all the guys are at least well above average athletes it comes back down to technique and strategy in my opinion. With the athleticism playing a (huge) role in the techniques and strategies used.
Just to clarify, in the United States do you think there are guys with backgrounds in any of the following TMAs who could also enjoy the success of Aldo, Pettis, prime Liddell and Jones: Goju Ryu Karate, Chito Ryu Karate, Eshin Karate, Ishin Ryu Karate, Shotokan Karate, Red Dragon Karate, Hapkido, Wing Chun and San Shou?
What annoys me is when people focus on techniques instead of fundamentals when talking about the evolution of MMA striking. "Look at this cool shoulder crank and fancy kick!" Instead of "look how easily jones was able to close distance, control the pace of the fight and smother glover." I care less if guys are throwing "wheel kicks" and more if guys are measuring, controlling and manipulating distance, creating openings, converting defense into offense and developing fluidity between different aspects of their games. People wanna see their favorite styles vindicated, I just wanna see guys become more fundamentally sound and competent fighters.