International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
@San Marino I have been digging on a YT channel that deals with airline crashes. Breaking down every fucking bit of it. It's not enjoyable, but my weird side puts it in a place.
I've also gotten into this stuff recently, what channel are you watching? I like Green Dot Aviation. Mentour Pilot is also good. Guys that run both channels are pilots (I think green dot guy might be a pilot in training, but he's very knowledgeable).

Just took a few flights to get to Peru a couple days ago, first time flying since deep diving this shit. Landing in Arequipa with all the mountains around was a bit nerve racking; lots of mountain crashes on those channels!
 
That is true but not all wars are the same. Some are more avoidable than others. We were not directly in involved with the first war but we put a target on our back by directly attacking Iran….

The Vietnam War was total bullshit but fighting the Nazis in WW2 was not.
Fucking wild you have to ( try and ) explain this to an adult.
 
That is true but not all wars are the same. Some are more avoidable than others. We were not directly in involved with the first war but we put a target on our back by directly attacking Iran….

The Vietnam War was total bullshit but fighting the Nazis in WW2 was not.

Very true but Russia and Ukraine is not even close to a bunch of genocidal maniacs potentially taking over Europe and the world.

The US should not be the world police.
 
Russia is not going to get involved in a direct confrontation with the United States for Iran. Especially not now with Ukraine still being a perpetual thorn in their side. They don't want a hot war with the US. They have more than enough problems as is.

I very much doubt that China is willing to go to war for Iran as well. They are smart - it's not worth it. The risk far outweighs the reward.

I don't think Iran is going to do anything because a lot more people are going to die there if they do and they know it. They already lost control of their skies, the last thing they want is the US Air Force to go full bore in their country. All they got was a free sample, nothing in comparison to what could be coming.

No one is willing to be destroyed for Iran but Iran.
Don't rule out China so quickly. They depend on Iranian energy. Notice that even Israel has avoided hitting Iran's energy industry. China might respond with actions against Taiwan.

I'm not ruling out anything. The forces operating in this world should not be underestimated.
 
Don't rule out China so quickly. They depend on Iranian energy. Notice that even Israel has avoided hitting Iran's energy industry. China might respond with actions against Taiwan.

I'm not ruling out anything. The forces operating in this world should not be underestimated.
China won’t act yet. They’re not quite ready for their invasion of Taiwan. I believe they are too disciplined to get sucked into a war before they think they’re ready.
 
Fucking wild you have to ( try and ) explain this to an adult.

You guys are proving my point perfectly here.

Biden war = good
Trump war = bad

It's hilarious that you guys think you're the peaceful anti war side while you're literally arguing against an anti war opinion. The irony is obviously lost on you.

Fucking wild that I have to explain that to an adult.
 
trump-donald-trump.gif


He was showing us he was serving both the entire time.
Looks like he can handle both at the same time.

I31CZZ.gif
 
Don't rule out China so quickly. They depend on Iranian energy. Notice that even Israel has avoided hitting Iran's energy industry. China might respond with actions against Taiwan.

I'm not ruling out anything. The forces operating in this world should not be underestimated.

Highly unlikely. They use Iranian energy. They aren't going to die for it.

It's questionable whether they even have the power to project significant military power outside of their borders.

They could aid Iran, but they aren't going to go to war for them.
 
Yeah, the conclusion seems odd to me too and they don't state the conditions for victory in the video. Former Chief of Staff though, so I'd think he's not making it up. Our military is obviously far more powerful so it must be contingent on what constitutes victory. For example, for as much damage as we did to the North Vietnamese, they still won the war. Afghanistan fell as soon as well pulled out, so forth
A lot of times those war games were never meant to be one. They’re usually about stress testing our systems to find the weak points. Guys like him have been popping up in the media for years now doing this for the attention and it’s annoying if you know how these things are run.

Loses like Vietnam and Afghanistan won’t be tested in those war games. We lost those wars due to self imposed restrictions and politics. Those were not military defeats so they wouldn’t be war games as such.

Invading Iran is a very daunting prospect. It’s a large country, large population, and a lot of mountains. They have a half decent military. All that said, we would still win on the battlefield and it would be one sided.
 
"For anyone not familiar with historical geopolitics, the Berlin-Baghdad railway plans paved the way for WW1.

The British and Russians were concerned about German industrial power being unleashed and circumventing British naval dominance.

Today it's USA concerned with China/Iran circumventing the petrodollar/US navy dominance.

Same story with the pipelines that were being planned in Syria/Iraq and with the natural gas pipelines going thru Ukraine into Europe and nordstream pipelines going from Russia to Germany."
 
Ah yes this sounds like the post of someone who isn't mad. Very convincing.

You must have forgotten about the Ukraine war where liberals were all about it while conservatives were not.

What's funny is the other guy in this thread whose reading comprehension failed him because he was so angry at me will come up if you search my username and the word "wars". I was anti war while he was pro war when it came to Ukraine. The fact that he came into this thread pretending like I'm now pro war is pretty funny. I'm not the one who flip flopped here.
Comparing this to Ukraine? Nobody was “all about” war in Ukraine, we supported arming Ukrainians to fight so our own troops didn’t have to. Trump has barreled us into a serious situation tnat we didn’t need to be involved in.
 
"Iran just finished that rail corridor , linking up with China through Iraq, Syria, and straight to the Med. That’s Belt and Road. That’s Eurasian trade bypassing Western choke points. That’s why they got hit. It’s not about gas. It’s about killing connectivity. The empire doesn’t bomb pipelines , they bomb independence. And that train line? It was a direct threat to the petrodollar and Suez leverage."
 
What if...

"A rail line that connects directly to Russia, India, and the BRICS block.

No tankers, no U.S. Navy, no petrodollar.

No SWIFT. No IMF. No permission.

And that’s why Iran got bombed.

Not for uranium. For sovereignty

What if...
 
  • Like
Reactions: N13
They are now in a race to actually complete the project.

It has been proven that psychotic nations will attack them unless they have a nuclear warhead with which to defend themselves.

Very stupid and naive shit.

Kim Jong un is like
asian-guy-thumbs-up-6615jp093en4klx9.gif


But way fatter of course
 
Very true but Russia and Ukraine is not even close to a bunch of genocidal maniacs potentially taking over Europe and the world.

The US should not be the world police.
Russia is currently genociding Ukrainians.

The Iranian Regime is garbage but you are out of your mind if you think they are dumb enough to nuke the West.

They still fight ISIS. They aren’t trying to install a global caliphate and kill all apostates. There are still Jews and Armenian Christians somehow still existing in Iran. You are gobbling up that Israeli war-mongering propaganda…..
 


Great so they took care of Iran right?

Can we address the other elephant in the room, Israel's nukes?

If Iran gave Ted Cruz over a million like Israel they could have nukes as well. At this point Israel has paid our politicians to use our military . I find it crazy since we send Israel a shit load of weapons and money. Basically Israel sends back 10% of the welfare we give them directly back to our politicians. I will give Israel credit they spread that money to both sides of the aisle because no matter what team controls our government they own both sides. They learned that trick from the bankers.
If Israel wants to attack Iran, go for it but leave the US the fuck out of it.
 
It's the saddest, laziest conclusion one could make.

Unbelievable that anyone would believe that crap in 2025.

There would be no point trying to hit Israel if America was then going to instantly vaporize you whether you succeeded or not. It's a dullard's fantasy, an entirely fictional boogeyman.
I think a bit of it is how prevelant nihilism is becoming in the west. Combined with mental health and idiots of course.


Because depends on the point you wish to prove really. Theres people in our countries not involved in this conflict that if they were in charge would launch the nukes. At Both and all sides

As fucked as it is. ive seen people call for iran to be nuked along with israel already by both sides [ along with rus /ukr paki / indi so its not just a race / religion boogeyman thing ] and these are considered " normal " people by most western standards, its completely acceptable rhetoric for some reasob . Their voices are heard and by an large accepted by our societies despite the massive disagreement most would have to the insane viewpoints being spoken.


So when told. This group is more extreme in their views than [ insert generic politician media host ] its more easily believable i guess?



Plus plenty of people like to imagine their choice would be to go down fighting in a blaze of glory. Well ill take em all with me movie shite lol.

Its far easier to have such rhetoric in the west
 
Back
Top