International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
So, you are saying all the 60% grade U-235 Iran had has all been destroyed? Okay. If you say so. You seem to be the "expert."

No, but you’re saying that it is basically all but confirmed that “cars” that evade satellites, and never mentioned in the articles you cite, somehow transported it all away.

is that your position? I mean you’re moving goalpost because nothing you mentioned is actually in the article you cited.

I do believe that basically their nuclear weapons program has been greatly delayed. Do you disagree?
 

Nations prepared to arm Iran with nuclear warheads after US strikes, Russia’s Medvedev claims​


* Russia and North Korea?

“Iran’s political regime has survived"

lol - yeah because Israel and the US chose not to kill them... yet. They know the exact rathole that their supreme leader is hiding in.
 


trump-donald-trump.gif


He was showing us he was servicing both the entire time.
 
Last edited:

I hope JD Vance can talk some sense into Trump…Netanyahu has been edging for a regime change forever. It’d be more brutal than Iraq because of the size of country and the mountain ranges….Add onto the fact that we won’t have any rebel groups on the ground like we did in Baghdad. It would likely be one of the most unpopular American wars in history.
 
Ahh yes, I'm super mad. In fact, everyone who disagrees with you or pushes back on your BS is super mad.

Nope, we're not laughing at you, we're all really mad!

Whatever helps you sleep at night, big lad.

Ah yes this sounds like the post of someone who isn't mad. Very convincing.

You must have forgotten about the Ukraine war where liberals were all about it while conservatives were not.

What's funny is the other guy in this thread whose reading comprehension failed him because he was so angry at me will come up if you search my username and the word "wars". I was anti war while he was pro war when it came to Ukraine. The fact that he came into this thread pretending like I'm now pro war is pretty funny. I'm not the one who flip flopped here.
 
Iran has had an infinite amount of time to activate "sleeper cells" inside the US, and haven't. Why? I can tell you why, because they don't exist, it does nothing to further their ambitions.
And what are those ambitions?

Like I said in the post you avoided, Iran has been telling the whole world for decades.
 
Last edited:
Iran has had an infinite amount of time to activate "sleeper cells" inside the US, and haven't. Why? I can tell you why, because they don't exist, it does nothing to further their ambitions.

They learned from 9/11. There's no better way to unite Americans behind their President than hitting them at home. It's in Iran's best interest to either do nothing or at most use some agitators to stir up protests and make it look like a bunch of Americans are angry.
 
I've said before, no country is going to self-immolate just to severely damage or destroy ONE enemy. Launching a nuke is just that - total self-destruction.

Iran has run several fairly low level terror plots/attempts, but these are often hidden behind proxies.

If anyone should live in fear of being openly and brazenly attacked for "reasons", I'd say it seems pretty clear that goes for Israel's opponents rather than Iran's.
The same nation that has stockpiles of enough drones and weapons to not only constantly be a threat.. and retailate to this extent at 50% capavcity on a pre emptive strike at them...... And sells them to russia the whole time.

But they will immediatedly apon developing a nuke would launch it at israel. Just like every other weapon developement the past 30 years iran has achieved...... they soley use them to annihilate israel with no provecation..... nor care about reprisal heh

Its a impressive conclusion to arrive to heh


Sad thing is. Everytime they get targeted it probably becomes more likely
 
what continues to bewilder me is why people underestimate President Trump time after time.

40 years ago, the guy literally wrote a book about how he wins every negotiation. It is all there. It is like his Art of War.

Then he executes exactly what he wrote about in his book, wins every negotiation, and some people still don't get it.

You don't have to agree with his philosophies and policies. But if you don't realize that every single thing that Trump does is part of his master strategy then you are either a victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome or you haven't been paying attention.
I listened to a review of his book. A lot of it was him bragging about doing illegal slumlord shit and then waging lawfare on anyone that tried to sue him for it. This idea that he is a master negotiator is made up. What he is is a master crook
 
They learned from 9/11. There's no better way to unite Americans behind their President than hitting them at home. It's in Iran's best interest to either do nothing or at most use some agitators to stir up protests and make it look like a bunch of Americans are angry.
I'm thinking that Iran could do it knowing that the US would respond with wrath. Then it might lead to something even worse: China and/or Russia get directly involved.

This is exactly what the warmongers and the globalists want. All out WW3.
 
The same nation that has stockpiles of enough drones and weapons to not only constantly be a threat.. and retailate to this extent at 50% capavcity on a pre emptive strike at them...... And sells them to russia the whole time.

But they will immediatedly apon developing a nuke would launch it at israel. Just like every other weapon developement the past 30 years iran has achieved...... they soley use them to annihilate israel with no provecation..... nor care about reprisal heh

Its a impressive conclusion to arrive to heh


Sad thing is. Everytime they get targeted it probably becomes more likely

It's the saddest, laziest conclusion one could make.

Unbelievable that anyone would believe that crap in 2025.

There would be no point trying to hit Israel if America was then going to instantly vaporize you whether you succeeded or not. It's a dullard's fantasy, an entirely fictional boogeyman.
 
Ah yes this sounds like the post of someone who isn't mad. Very convincing.

You must have forgotten about the Ukraine war where liberals were all about it while conservatives were not.

What's funny is the other guy in this thread whose reading comprehension failed him because he was so angry at me will come up if you search my username and the word "wars". I was anti war while he was pro war when it came to Ukraine. The fact that he came into this thread pretending like I'm now pro war is pretty funny. I'm not the one who flip flopped here.
Ukraine was resisting an illegal invasion.

Trump just attacked a country because Israel didn’t like them. This is hugely different….
 
I'm thinking that Iran could do it knowing that the US would respond with wrath. Then it might lead to something even worse: China and/or Russia get directly involved.

This is exactly what the warmongers and the globalists want. All out WW3.

Russia is not going to get involved in a direct confrontation with the United States for Iran. Especially not now with Ukraine still being a perpetual thorn in their side. They don't want a hot war with the US. They have more than enough problems as is.

I very much doubt that China is willing to go to war for Iran as well. They are smart - it's not worth it. The risk far outweighs the reward.

I don't think Iran is going to do anything because a lot more people are going to die there if they do and they know it. They already lost control of their skies, the last thing they want is the US Air Force to go full bore in their country. All they got was a free sample, nothing in comparison to what could be coming.

No one is willing to be destroyed for Iran but Iran.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N13
Oh come on now
Yeah, the conclusion seems odd to me too and they don't state the conditions for victory in the video. Former Chief of Staff though, so I'd think he's not making it up. Our military is obviously far more powerful so it must be contingent on what constitutes victory. For example, for as much damage as we did to the North Vietnamese, they still won the war. Afghanistan fell as soon as well pulled out, so forth
 
It is different but the US doesn't need to be involved in either.
That is true but not all wars are the same. Some are more avoidable than others. We were not directly in involved with the first war but we put a target on our back by directly attacking Iran….

The Vietnam War was total bullshit but fighting the Nazis in WW2 was not.
 
Ah yes this sounds like the post of someone who isn't mad. Very convincing.

You must have forgotten about the Ukraine war where liberals were all about it while conservatives were not.

What's funny is the other guy in this thread whose reading comprehension failed him because he was so angry at me will come up if you search my username and the word "wars". I was anti war while he was pro war when it came to Ukraine. The fact that he came into this thread pretending like I'm now pro war is pretty funny. I'm not the one who flip flopped here.
Weird I was against anyone attacking anybody, liberals generally speaking were for Ukraine defending itself and against Russian expansionism

You do/or are able to understand that you can be against war and pro helping Ukraine right ?

And many conservatives were also all for helping Ukraine, many still are .
 
Back
Top