I can't find it anywhere but I'm sure I read something (more recently then 2013) that says the promotion has final say in the rankings. To me that makes compete and total sense. I'm not a legal guy so could that explain why it wasn't subpoenaed? If it's not secret because it's in the fine print is there a need to subpoena it? Asking that in earnest.
With everything we've seen from the UFC over the years I just have major trouble believing that they'd leave something as widely discussed, speculated on and important as their rankings entirely to an independent panel. It just doesn't mesh with what we know about their corporate philosophy. To me the examples help confirm it, not prove it outright.
https://mmajunkie.usatoday.com/2018...nkings-ronda-rousey-privilege-twitter-mailbag
This is the best thing I could find.
https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2020/6/...receives-suggestions-shane-burgos-josh-emmett
There's also this. I know they're just suggestions, I get that but if panel members need suggestions on how to rank fighters are they actually qualified as panelists? Or are they puppets doing the UFC's bidding for them?