I'm going to go ahead and say that I believe UFC 207 is a better card than UFC 205, knowing that I will almost surely be in the minority if not the lone person who says that. There are two facts that make UFC 205 seem to be untouchable: Three Title Fights and incredible depth in card. I do believe UFC 205 still has a deeper lineup from top to bottom, but when it comes to the main card, I believe UFC 207 is better. Velasquez vs. Werdum is the equivalent to Weidman vs. Romero (In My opinion better) Dillashaw vs. Lineker is better than Tate vs. Pennington I believe that the Garbrandt/Cruz fight is the equivalent to the Welterweight and Strawweight title fights combined. And I believe Rousey/Nunes is the equivalent to McGregor/Alvarez. McGregor's history chase is just as suspenseful as Rousey's return, but I personally believe Nunes is a stronger opponent than Alvarez. To me, the biggest difference is Garbradnt/Cruz. Although 205 had three title fights, neither of the other two title fights were nearly as big to me as Cruz/Garbradnt, even without the trash talking buildup that's led up to it. So, I believe that 207 is slightly better. I understand if you disagree, but the belief that it is even this close tells me that the card is underhyped. It is focusing a bit too much on Rousey's return and not what is actually an incredible lineup. The Velasquez/Werdum match is particularly neglected more than I would have ever thought possible. What say you? Better than 205? Underhyped?