- Joined
- Nov 20, 2002
- Messages
- 11,887
- Reaction score
- 8,850
All are fake out of images shown.
Todd Standing is a Bigfoot hoaxer. First images are Todd's.
Most solid photography is the Patterson footage.
All are fake out of images shown.
Todd Standing is a Bigfoot hoaxer. First images are Todd's.
Bigfoot believers are the most frustrating people to talk to.
1. Bigfoot is huge, which is not conducive to hiding
2. In order for the bigfoot species to survive, there has to be a bunch of them, so they can mate with each other.
3. Something that big has to eat a lot
So if they were real we'd see a bunch of them running around leaving tracks, poop, and animal carcasses all over the place.
So if there are a bunch of huge things
Most solid photography is the Patterson footage.
They probably hide well, and bury their own. You know how huge forests and other isolated regions are? Out of all the sightings and ancient scripture and past stories, I’m sure it is a rare intelligent species probably more human than animal. It’s not entirety impossible to assume they’re a small amount of these creatures hiding in remote regions all over the world, maybe even in undiscovered caves.Bruh if you think giant 400lb monkeys are secretly roaming around North America, you've lost all sense of reasoning. Like you're literally retarded if you think that's a "reasonable position".
Bunch of inbred hillbilly bullshit. If you're a grown ass man and you say that you think bigfoot is real, you shouldn't hold any position of responsibility.
yeah but we used to believe germs weren't real, you know maybe he's out there like predator and shit and he's invisible when he wants to be. shit man he's interdimensional, probably kicks it with the elite psycho interdimensional energy vampiresSome of the theories out there trying to justify the belief are truly hilarious. I've seen people claim they can sense cameras via magic, which is why there has never been a picture or video that wasn't swiftly debunked.
So just to reiterate this point...
You are telling me that you cannot name a single comparable example of a unique and large species being discovered in the woods of North America? Not one other species in modern history that legitimizes the theory that biologists don't have a complete enough database of species in North America.
I'm more that happy to learn new things. There's plenty of cool shit to learn. I don't have any time for that nonsense though. Word of mouth from idiots and sketchy video isn't imperical evidence and doesn't substantiate any claims to a reasonable degree.
well if you just want to make fun of people but not engage seriously maybe you should switch forums and stop politicizing this one.
i just stated that the "magic" idea is an offshoot of a much more reasonable one grounded in primate science.
You know you're in the Mayberry right? Who the fuck says bigfoot discussion needs to be engaged seriously? Have a sense of humor.
If we went by that then most endangered species would be extinct by @jgarner 's operational definition, which sucks. You can't even apply it past your own personal point of view. Seems like the guy just isn't well-read or well versed in terms of logical and critical thinking.i think the premise is absurd. you are saying that for there to be a large undiscovered species out there we should be seeing many more of them. i think that is faulty reasoning. obviously if this species exists it is barely holding onto its existence and/or is an outlier and is not surrounded by multiple other large undiscovered species.
not sure why you think multiple large undiscovered species is more likely than one remnant species.
you said you "don't have any time" to look into this. ok but perhaps you should not then be commenting on it. it is the opposite of scientific to deny the possibility while refusing to read any of the relevant literature or listen with a truly open mind to people in the field who have something to say.
in fact you don't even know the nature of the research that you are refuting. you are just refuting caricatures of your own fabrication.