Great points. If I could change one thing about the way fights are currently judged, it would be to take guard as a neutral position. You get points for taking a guy down, but from there if you want to be considered winning, you have to use the position.
why limit to guard?I agree with this
I agree with this
why limit to guard?
if the guy on the bottom of side control is fucking up the guy on top, he's winning.
why limit to guard?
if the guy on the bottom of side control is fucking up the guy on top, he's winning.
These days MMA has evolved to the point where fighter belong to training camps that use a similar mix of BJJ, Muay Thai, Wrestling, and Boxing with most weaknesses accounted for.
Have UFC fights becomg less entertaining because everyone fights almost the same style now?
Is it more exciting to watch well-rounded fighters highly skilled in similar martial arts?
Or is it more entertaining to see fighters with a very strong style preference, but with bigger holes in their games?