- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,165
- Reaction score
- 8,486
No chance .....barely top 10 based on accomplishments.....I do think he could beat most everyone else .....But he’s a front runner that looks for the door at the first sign of adversity
Wow ....you’re a clueless ....go back to the drawing board budDoesn't have the resume, but based on ability alone he is top2-3. DC was just a bad match up for him.
He is the best MMA striker ever, never got outstruck, dropped or rocked on the feet.
I get what your saying, but wouldn't that make Jon Jones, Khabib or GSP that best strikers ever?Yes, sorry I don't care about hispter's definitions of "good striking". Effectiveness is what matters.
Rampage, Shogun, Machida, Chuck etc...all ahead of Rumble.
Rumble could beat those guys in a hypothetical fight, but he's accomplished far less.
Nowhere close to top 10
Hell nah.
Shogun, Wanderlei, Chuck, Jackson....
Probably more I'm forgetting.....
There's more then 10 former LHW champions, all of whom had more than 4 top 5 victories... and that's just the champions.Thats a stretch. He has four top5 wins at UFC LHW
Other than the obvious names like Jones, Cormier, Shogun, Rampage, Lyoto, Shad, Chuck, Tito, he is right there
Deffo 3rd acer DC and Jan.After Jones and Cormier? Is that fair to place him as number 3?
no. some guy names chuck randy and rashid have something to say about that.
Vitor had rumble diving for his anklesDoesn't have the resume, but based on ability alone he is top2-3. DC was just a bad match up for him.
He is the best MMA striker ever, never got outstruck, dropped or rocked on the feet.
Shogun, Rampage and Chuck have the chins to outlast him I believe.Rumble outstrikes all of those guys...he only gets in danger if he tires out and ends up on the ground (most likely to happen with prime Shogun). The problem, though, is Rumble didn't fight enough at LHW to rank in the Top 3 all time. Very impressive wins over Bader, Davis, Glover, etc. though.