- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 28,908
- Reaction score
- 15,212
you cry so much it makes me laugh.
I'd say the same about you if I cared about what you post.
you cry so much it makes me laugh.
He’s balding with a terrible hairline and wears a winter hat all year long to hide said baldness. He’s also a political hack no one takes seriously.
If you think that’s “doing well” I have this boat with holes I’m looking to sell. It is also “doing well”
pussyI'd say the same about you if I cared about what you post.
I've always been conservative but considered myself more moderate prior to a few years ago. I don't think my views have changed, I think the left just can't control its absurd base and have gone so far left that every one else seems extreme right by comparison.
“I voted twice for OBAMA but now I’m gonna vote for the compete polar opposite and vote for TRUMP”
That’s a good one too.
How so? It may not be mainstream left talking point about supporting sweeping government social policies but I think leftists would support that right?
What am I missing?
LMAO at least I have dad
Someone's salty because daddy doesn't love them lmao.
Yes, mostly.How so? It may not be mainstream left talking point about supporting sweeping government social policies but I think leftists would support that right?
What am I missing?
@Hatorade are you talking about Nationalization of key infrastructure?
It's not a choice between the environment and the economy. Environmental ruin is bad for the economy, and innovations in green energy are good for the economy. It is a choice between propping up existing energy tech and helping the transition. Oil industry propaganda and then consumers of said propaganda are the only people who would frame the issue the way he did. Likewise, no one thinks that "this country would run better under large sweeping gov't social policies than it would with private insurance companies and large corporations simply because of how big this country." Again, that's industry framing that is internalized by consumers of rightist media.
Yes, mostly.
As far as things like healthcare, prisons, education, energy, auto and home insurance etc
I'm not saying the government would be more efficient at this stuff, but I think society would benefit less from these things being privatized because of less checks and balances. I can say with zero hesitation, that as a business owner myself, I could fuck you way harder than the government could because I don't have as many people looking over my shoulder.
Do you think he sounded right-wing when he posted this in February?:
If not, I could give you some more. Crazy that anyone fell for the OP. Partisanship is a brain-rotter.
Oh gotcha yeah I cant agree with his
"concerened more for the Evironment than the ecconomy"
I guess it will be hard to have good welfare,healthcare if ecconomy goes to the drain.
I love the environment I dont like polution I will support evironmental regulations.
But as I have stated in another thread I want to eat more Animals.
I assume as a matter of fact that there's a disaffected left wing because I know them personally, and nobody with a brain is changing their opinions on social ownership because of MSNBC or CNN.
<{monica}>This is called the “Tim Pool syndrome”
Yeah, I'm not saying the government isn't corrupt because obviously it is, but compared to large private insurance firms, private energy producers, local contractors like myself etc........the big bad government isn't so awful.Agree here thanks for the reply.
I think some people underestimate the capacity of the private sector to be corupt and incompetent.
Like private Telcos screwing customers with far reduced bandwiths but are not being penalized for over charging.
You are very similar to me. Anyway, as the radical left move more to the center, I compensate by moving more to the right.
Ppl trusted snake oil salesman twice, but pissed and try something completely different