I don't think the queston is about legacy. I think Max is absolutely better, but that has to do with 10+ years of knowledge to grow on. The sport has developed. Hollaway entered when the base knowledge was on another level. Had BJ entered the same time with his gifts, his new gen pre prime version would be better than his actual prime version. If that makes sense...Hell no. Very few are.
BJ gave GSP all he could handle in their first fight.
Destroyed Gomi and prime Hughes.
These guys are legends.
Won multiple titles.
How is this even a question.
I'm a Holloway fan, but cmon.
prime Bj wouldn't have won 2 belts if he was competing in the current rosters
Prime BJ is overrated. Has a terrible record and people think he's good because he outclassed hughes. Hughes was a limited fighter and the perfect match up in favour of Penn.
in a weak pool of part-time fighters. Both would struggle to be top 10 if they hit their prime.Perfect matchup for Penn? Lol. Except that time Hughes beat BJ's ass. Hughes was a beast when he was younger.
in a weak pool of part-time fighters. Both would struggle to be top 10 if they hit their prime.
Pettis didnt even make weight, clearly something was wrong.
Because of that his win over Pettis is not impressive.
Tho his winstreak is
There are a plethora of MMA fighters 125-155 that are better than prime Penn.
People's nostalgia makes them deluded. Holloway would smoke him.
Nah, I think if prime BJ and current Holloway fought, Max would win. The game has evolved too much since BJ was the best.[/QUOTE]
The Matt Hughes that BJ beat for the title would curb stomp Max Holloway. This thread is fucking stupid. The 30-40lb weight difference along with Hughes being a far superior grappler would lead to a barbaric beating.Prime BJ is overrated. Has a terrible record and people think he's good because he outclassed hughes. Hughes was a limited fighter and the perfect match up in favour of Penn.