- Joined
- Oct 17, 2018
- Messages
- 3,627
- Reaction score
- 3,041
Quite living in the past friend. The sport has evolved immensely since Coleman and Randleman were relevant.b4 usin´this kind of superlatives, try to do some research.
Quite living in the past friend. The sport has evolved immensely since Coleman and Randleman were relevant.b4 usin´this kind of superlatives, try to do some research.
Great..Great... but are ya sure ya really know about these skill sets ya´re dismissin´?Quite living in the past friend. The sport has evolved immensely since Coleman and Randleman were relevant.
Title says it all. Kevin Lee was apparently going to beat Khabib 6 months ago. And MMA has apparently evolved so much in the last 15-20 years. So surely a modern day LW/WW would be way more advanced than an ancient HW? Especially a notoriously limited HW like Hammerhouse produced.
Wrestling? Coleman and Randleman are at worst equal to Lee here. At worst
Striking? Again pretty equal. Randleman KOd Cro Cop. What has Lee ever done on the feet?
BJJ? None of them can even spell BJJ so again pretty even.
Cardio? Again non existent for all 3.
Ive just realised... Kevin Lee is Team Hammerhouse. Holy shit!
It depends on which division we're talking about. Heavyweight and Light Heavyweight are notoriously worse than back in the day, MW could be argued has remained as top heavy as it has ever been, but WW and below have gotten much better on average imo.I agree, a common misconception is that fighters have gotten better. I don’t agree with that if anything they’ve gotten worst.
Beating Barboza definitely inflated his rankingTop 5? He’s clearly never been better than Khabib, Tony, Dustin, Justin, Mcg, Cowboy or Al. I’d even favor other LWs over Kevin. Kevin has trash cardio, ok striking at best and 1 good round in him before he’s a slow prodding target. Lee is one of the most overrated fighter I can recall in recent memory.
It depends on which division we're talking about. Heavyweight and Light Heavyweight are notoriously worse than back in the day, MW could be argued has remained as top heavy as it has ever been, but WW and below have gotten much better on average imo.
The top players of each generation would have a spot in the top 15, but you can't say that those lower weight classes have gotten worse.
This is not true at all. Kevin Randleman could absolutely starch some these fat HW "strikers". You don't think Mark Coleman could take down Greg Hardy or Derek Lewis? They both beat Mark Hunt blindfolded.Yes. Much more.
He was arguably Top 5 at LW---the deepest class, in 2018.
Coleman and Randleman would likely lose to every HW on the roster...and HW has always sucked.
Could you at least name them? WW is the one I have the most issue with since Jon Fitch was the no.2 guy for a long time, and both Usman and Colby are better versions of him. Shit, skillwise I'd favor them over Shields too.I disagree, I would only say MW has gotten better. Plenty of guys who were never able to become champ back in the day would be able to nowadays hypothetically if they were still in their prime. Especially at WW.
Good griefThe only evolution in MMA happened from the 90s to the 2000s. Since the 2005ish era, elite fighters are no different than they were 15 years ago.
Hell in the heavier divisions they're worse atm.
Would they really though? HW is a division full of aging one dimensional fighters so I find it unlikely they couldn't trade wins and loses outside the top 5.Yes. Much more.
He was arguably Top 5 at LW---the deepest class, in 2018.
Coleman and Randleman would likely lose to every HW on the roster...and HW has always sucked.
Pretty sureGreat..Great... but are ya sure ya really know about these skill sets ya´re dismissin´?